My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1977_0509
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1977
>
CC_Minutes_1977_0509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:57:17 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 2:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/9/1977
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />COUNCILMAN HESS: The sewer is in. <br /> <br />MR. REILING~ It1s in 15 years. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Since 1960 it1s been in. <br /> <br />MR. REILING: Nobody has used (inaudible) except <br />Shoreview coming thr.Jugh \'li th their sewage. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: Who built that? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I1m not sure which organization had the <br />contract - whether it was Rosevi11e or a combination of the <br />two. Certainly we'll research.. This proposal tonight is <br />not proposing any assessments for that sewer. We1re not <br />proposing to build a duplicate sewer, and are not proposing to <br />assess anyone end start sending them bills next fall, but <br />you're correct that as the sewer would be utilized, then the <br />appropriate fees would be charged, and if there are any credits <br />involved, those would be also brought to bear. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: Because it could be a possibility <br />that the oversizing of sewer lines - of course, we're getting <br />credits now from the Metropolitan Sewer Board, and I would <br />assume some of our sewer lines (inaudible) this area or farther <br />south have been oversized and that would be taken into consid- <br />eration at the time rates were (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. REILING: Possibly so, but I know the statement WeS <br />no assessment, and I was amazed on the next tax assessment to <br />find we were assessed and that was for the trunk, so that was <br />charged. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: You have been paying sanitary sewer - <br /> <br />MR. REILING: (inaudible) area assessment. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: An acreage assessment. <br /> <br />MR. REILING: Water too. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I did not understand what you said about it <br />being satisfactory to let the water get through to Owasso. <br /> <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.