My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1980_1117
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
198x
>
1980
>
CC_Minutes_1980_1117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:59:01 AM
Creation date
2/2/2005 5:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/1980
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Highway 8 in Roseville is far in excess of <br />32 feet. It's probably more than double that width. It may be <br />in the country, but in Roseville it far exceeds it. <br /> <br />MR. WALTER B. PARSONS, SR., 2730 North Oxford: I have <br />resided there for more than 27 years. The Council precipitated a <br />city-wide program of widening and curb and gutter nature three <br />or four years ago and this led to a tremendous turnout at several <br />public hearings and I remember a day in August when Fairview <br />School was packed, largely by people opposed to this on a city <br />wide basis. There was an attempt to justify this by savings in <br />maintenance. <br /> <br />I just (inaudible)my realtor (inaudible) any realtor said <br />any upgrading because of curb and gutter and street improvement <br />quote would be insignificant and wouldn't be the kind of thing you'd <br />mention to a potential customer over the telephone or in showing <br />the property. <br /> <br />At the time that the city-wide program was proposed three or <br />four years ago, the Council and their counsel declined to be <br />interested in any kind of a survey. I personally proposed a <br />professional survey to get a real sampling of the opinions of the <br />people. I think later (inaudible) volunteers were sought for <br />service on a committee to look into the thing, on which I applied. <br />I stated in my main approach would be to try to put out some kind <br />of survey flyer along with our sewer bills where we could get a <br />good coverage of the city and not just those that came to the <br />hearings. I wasn't appointed to the committee, incidentally. <br />As I understand it, one of our Councilmen, Mr. Kehr, was an <br />instigator of the survey and perhaps had a lot to do with the <br />survey which perhaps had something to do with the city not going <br />ahead with that. <br /> <br />Now we will have a wave of these spot improvements. I checked <br />Witil a member of the Public Works Department today and from what he <br />said, this is the biggest influx of petitions for this work. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We have been doing them every year. . This is <br />the largest number this year, but it has increased every year <br />since 1976. <br /> <br />MR. PARSONS: So this is the big one this year. I think <br />there's a tendency when we have approximately 75% assessed in the <br />General Fund and 25% assessed to the individual property - <br />abutting property - that you have a kind of a situation in a small <br />way like you have sometimes when you think about - let's get it <br />from Washington. It doesn't come out of our pocket so we have a <br />chance for the Council to demonstrate some courage by voting some <br />of these down where at least there isn't a tremendous preponderance <br />of favor in the neighborhood. You have a chance for the Council <br />to not get us into a position where everybody has a beef because <br />he's going to pay for three-fourths of it for everybody else in <br />the village anyway. <br /> <br />I'd like to make a pitch that this is not the kind of decision <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.