My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1980_1117
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
198x
>
1980
>
CC_Minutes_1980_1117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:59:01 AM
Creation date
2/2/2005 5:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/1980
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7 <br /> <br />imagine after 20 years the roots are good and I think there's a <br />good possibility that the tree could be killed. <br /> <br />I also am not that thrilled about a 4 to 1 slope. That's <br />difficult to maintain. It's about the steepest slope you can get <br />with residential property. <br /> <br />Also, with the driveway, if you have to come back a ways, <br />which you will probably in my yard to slope the driveway up, <br />we're going to possibly come out with a crown effect where from the <br />edge of the driveway there will be a slope down to the front yard, <br />so where it's now level with the yard and the driveway now, there will <br />be a slight slope.I'm fearful of that, and all things considered, I <br />just feel that I'm not that thrilled about the project. <br /> <br />MRS. JUDY DAWES, 2830 North Oxford: East side of the street. <br />I'm in favor of this construction. We have an engineer friend <br />who works with other municipalities in this area. He definitely <br />states that this improvement will raise the value of our property. <br />I talked to a real estate friend. He states this will raise the <br />value of our property by more than the cost of the improvement. <br />A thing I want to point out to everyone is the interest that we <br />pay on this improvement is tax deductible. Another thing I want <br />to point out is driving on the present street in the winter when <br />there is a fresh snowfall, it's almost impossible to get up on <br />the north end of the street. After three tries you just back up <br />and go around to the west and go to Churchill Street and drive <br />around and come up from Woodhill. <br /> <br />Another thing I want to state is construction costs are down <br />now because contractors are looking for work, so $14.50 a foot <br />is a good price. <br /> <br />MRS. JUDY SMOOT, 2854 North Oxford: I oppose this. The <br />32-foot widening of the street will cause children to be hurt - <br />which I have a small daughter. Highway 8 as I have noticed, <br />d~iving, which is out in the country, is not 32 feet. Why should <br />ours be 32 feet? The natural beauty and everything of the street <br />would be ruined by the concrete. I have also lived in the City of <br />St. Paul where they widened the street and when they have <br />widened (inaudible) narrowed it during the winter. The snow piles <br />up. Children do not get hurt when there are not curbs. People <br />don't drive as fast when there are no curbs. I bought my house <br />three years ago because I loved the natural beauty and now I'm <br />told there'll be (inaudible) and I lose property. I lose quite a <br />bit by having that taken out. I am opposed to it, and I did not <br />sign the original petition. <br /> <br />Several of the houses have been sold in that street in the <br />meantime so that first petition would have to be done over, and <br />the second petition with the 29 names, you can make that 30, and <br />my husband would be 31. We were not able to sign the petition <br />because we both work, so I'm against it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.