CC_Minutes_1990_1126 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville City Council Meeting November 26, 1990 C-2 Thomas moved, Maschka seconded, that discussion of ordinance amendments to Section 17 of the City Code concerning Planned Unit Developments be continued to a Special City Council meeting of Wednesday, January 9, 1991, at 5:30 p.m., and that the public hearing to consider the amendments be continued to the regular City Council meeting of January 14, 1991. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Cushman, Thomas, Maschka, and Rog. Nays: None. C-3 Cushman moved, Thomas seconded, that discussion of ordinance amendments to implement Design standards and to delete unnecessary and redundant sections of the City Code be continued to a special City council meet- ing of Wednesday, January 9, 1991, at 5:30 p.m., and that the public hearing to consider the amendments be continued to the regular City Council meeting of January 14, 1991. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Cushman, Thomas, Maschka, and Rog. Nays: None. Page 3 ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS SECTION 17 CITY CODE TO OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS DESIGN STANDARDS TO C-4 Maschka moved, Cushman seconded, that Resolution 8628, RESOLUTION recommending vacation of a portion of Owasso Boulevard 8628 South at the request of Gordon Fenner, be adopted with the following conditions: 1. That all required assessments be paid. 2. That a recommendation be forwarded to Ramsey County to vacate the right-of-way. Roll Call, Ayes: and Rog. Nays: Johnson, Cushman, Thomas, Maschka, None. C-5 Thomas moved, Maschka seconded, that Thomas Theisen/ THOMAS THEISEN Welsh Company's request for Special Use Permit and WELSH COMPANY license for an amusement room at 1655 County Road B-2 be denied based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That amusement rooms create a potential for increased police activity--an example is a high incidence of disorderly conduct. 2. That an amusement room is incompatible with and has a serious negative factor on the adjoining neighborhood. 3. That safety issues in and, particularly, around the interior mall area, including adjoining property due to congregating juveniles, are a factor. 4. That safety and security in the adjoining mall parking lot is a major factor.