|
applications for the year ending December 30, 2002. Roll Call,
<br />Ayes: Maschka, Mastel, Goedeke, Klausing and Kysylyczyn.
<br />Nays: none.
<br />C-6Mastel moved, Goedeke seconded, to approve the following bills
<br />Approval of Bills
<br />and total amounts:
<br />1,234.88
<br />1350
<br />1352-136112,198.17
<br />13963-14028497,558.71
<br />14029-140373,249.10
<br />14038-14140875,535.13
<br />14141-1418769,688.03
<br />14188-1425716,629.26
<br />14258-142676,701.26
<br />14268-14334360,580.62
<br />$1,843,275.16
<br />Roll Call, Ayes: Maschka, Mastel, Goedeke, Klausing and
<br />Kysylyczyn. Nays: none.
<br />D.Items Removed from Consent Agenda
<br />E.Organizational Business
<br />F.Reports And Recommendations
<br />F-1Goedeke asked about street construction bonding, and a
<br />Resolution 9952
<br />segregated, perpetual, sinking fund for maintenance. Kysylyczyn
<br />Project Locations
<br />asked about the City?s MSA fund balance. Mastel asked about
<br />2002 PMP
<br />Josephine Road and West Owasso Boulevard reconstructions
<br />andexpressed concern about these contracts.
<br />Mastel moved, Maschka seconded, to adopt a resolution
<br />approving Project Locations for the 2002 Pavement Management
<br />Program: Streets, Pathways and Parking Lots. Roll Call, Ayes:
<br />Maschka, Mastel, Goedeke, Klausing and Kysylyczyn. Nays:
<br />none.
<br />G.Recognitions & Announcements
<br />G-1Moved to beginning of Agenda.
<br />City Donation
<br />H.Hearings
<br />H-1Welsch presented. Mastel asked whether the property owner was
<br />Resolution 9953
<br />current on property taxes. Kysylyczyn asked about lien holders.
<br />1661 Stanbridge Street
<br />Maschka commented about tax forfeiture. Goedeke asked about
<br />Abatement
<br />occupancy of the structure. Klausing asked how, and how likely it
<br />(PF3200)
<br />is that, the City and its citizens will recoup the $37,354 in
<br />proposed abatement costs. Mastel asked about occupancy
<br />during reconstruction. Goedeke asked about the appraised value
<br />of the home. Kysylyczyn asked about painting versus vinyl siding,
<br />and the general level to which abated property should be raised.
<br />Mastel, Maschka, and Klausing commented in favor of siding.
<br />Klausing commented on health, safety and welfare concerns.
<br />Kysylyczyn moved, Mastel seconded, to continue this agenda
<br />item to the November 26, 2001 Council meeting, in order to
<br />receive more information regarding the amount of the outstanding
<br />mortgage on the property, any liens, and the appraised value of
<br />the property. Following Council discussion, Kysylyczyn withdrew
<br />the motion.
<br />Maschka moved, Mastel seconded, to authorize, by resolution,
<br />the Community Development Director to abate those City Code
<br />
<br />
|