Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />- 2 - <br /> <br />0.'..". <br />,"'>'6.:.. <br /> <br />, R:>BERTS WOODffiIDGE ADDITION, PRELIMINARY PLAT (2-3...60F) <br />The existing road and sever \d1.ich are located in the center or this propoeed plat are <br />private. If the plat is accepted &8 submitted lots ot approximately 300 ft. depths will <br />be isolated on each side or th1s addition. <br /> <br />Moved by Franke, s800nded b7 Membra. that this natter be tabled until the next regular <br />meeting and that the adjacent property owners be invited to the meeting to discuss plans <br />tor the whole area, motion carried. <br /> <br />SLAWIK SHOPPINO cmTER (l-19-60A) <br />U Willard Thoreson and Harold Slavik appeared to d1.SOUS8 the plans tor the d8'f'e1otmtent of <br />the shopping center. Thores:>n presented a drawing showing a 3 acre pond1ng area south <br />, ot Sk11.lmen which vas said will be dedicated or given to the Village as a park on a long <br />term ]sase. The Highway Department has been consulted and informed that it was <br />calculated. that a 2 inch rainf'a1l would raise the level ot Z1nnerman Lake aoout 7 inches; <br />it was said that the Lake could tolerate this increase. <br /> <br />Chairman a,n resolved the problem into segments. <br />1. 1be vater now 1s an engineering problem which should be discussed with the Villap.e <br />Englnecrr. <br />2. As no zoning application has been tiled. the Planning COmnd.sa1. on cannot take any <br />action on this matter. <br />3. Rather than a Bonine request, perhaps a l!lpecial ul!le permit should be requssted. 'l1te <br />special use permit cou1d allow pt.rking on land zonld R-l, would not a1lov eonstruotion <br />ot buildings tor colllllerical purposes on land Boned R-l, and could apply conditions ot <br />lard use as agreed upon at the time the special use permit was granted, if at all. <br /> <br />APPROVAL or t-:INUTES (2..3-600) <br />Franke moved, ~rman secomed that the ndnutes tar the regular and special meeting <br />in Januar;y be approvedJ motion carried. <br /> <br />FRANK TSCHIDA REZONING REQI1F.ST (2-3-60H) <br />This petition was tabled at the November 6, 19S9. meeting to enable the attorney to <br />contmlt with the Villap Attomey. At each subsequeat lIIeeting- of the cOlllll1ssion the <br />matter had been tabled as no one has appeared before the oODllllission to c1ar1tr this <br />matter. Franke mewed, So1ke seconded that the petition be dried on the basis that <br />it would constitute "spot" BOning as aU ot the surrounding land is currently zoned R-lJ <br />motion carried. <br /> <br />\---- <br /> <br />HEW BUSINmS - <br /> <br />B. BECII: RE1DNINO REQUEST (2-3-601) <br />l. The secretary informed the commission or the Beck rezoning request which the Council <br />returned to Mr-. .Beck. <br />2. <br />2. ORDINANCE TO RESTRICT ZONING PETI'l'IONS (2-3-60.1) <br />Membras JIO'Ifed. Simmerlllm seconded that it be reconnended that an ordinance be drawn <br />to restrict acceptance ot further Boning petitions tor a period ot six months arter a <br />zoning petition has been denied. Motion ammended b7 Franke, seconded by' Soike that <br />the wDt'd8, "an ordinance be drawnl be deleted bom the motion and the vorda "a stu~ be <br />made" be substituted. Amendment carried. The Tote on the motion as amerded failed to <br />carry (For Franke) <br /> <br />Mared by Franke seconded by' SoikB that it be reco-med to the Council that an <br />ordinance be created vh1ch is comparable to that in adjacent coll1lOn1t1e8, the purpose <br />of which vill be to restrict the acceptance ot a laDing petition, once denied, tC1t' a <br />fixed Period ot time or IIpproxinsatel;y six months unless substantial changes baYe been <br />Made in the zoning pel:t1on. Motion carried unan1mous~. <br />