pm_600601 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

... J - Franke mOV'ed and Boike seconded thrt action be tabled for further study until July 6, 1960. Hotion carried unanimously. J 7. PIJ, T :)'10' KROISS' NOBTffi()OD AD1)ITION Rq Kro1ss, 147, Transit, presented a revioed plat (ref'. 5/h/60) 'Yf;hich shcn<Jed that the lot sizes now conform. However, the problem the intersection of !.fatilda and Coo Rd. 02 had not been resolved. Kroiss stated that Frank Tschida. t-JOuld lose four lots on the west e1de of this plat if }taWda 'Here moved. Only blooks 2, 3, 4, flnd 5 or this plat are cUrr'ently needed by Kreiss J the area west or Farri ngton is nroposed as a plat tor F. Tschida. Kroiss and Sautter contended that current drainage problems at H'atilda and ]3..2 proclude alternative plans tor the street location. 't1hen Be!"tlee Hornesites nnd Hest View' Addition were platted. natural drainage directed large quantities of water on the F.. Tschida propertq. Graul pointed out that Kreiss is current.'ly moving considerable amounts of land to the north side of this plat to cover a low area and ra10ed the question whether further problems in drainage would be created by this action. Sautter pointed out that the rillage sanitary sewer is being constructed in this area and it would be very dea1rable to resolve the problems and to get this plat on record so that the location at a sewnI' lift station could be determined. Melllbre. moved, mUes seconded that the matter be tabled until June 21st and that DahJ.lu'en and Sautter jo1nt~ examine the area and report on their findings for the ._Una of the 21st. Hotton carried, Franke opposed. 8. CURB CUT FOR DRIVE'lAY AT THE OOLDE1J AOE mmsrm HOltE This action was requested by I.fr. nonald Johnson, 1415 co. Rd. n, operator of the bl1n8 home. t-lr. Johnson desires to put in a curved driveway' from County Road B to the front door of the nursing home to pennit visitors and residents of the home to enter cars nearby the tront door. Mr. Johnson W8 reminded by' the commission that Ordtnance No. 253 specifically prohibited eetab11ebment ot a driY8Vq from Coun't1' Road "an and that this was one of the conditions Upon which Ws nu1's!118 home was granted a building parmi t. Mr. Johnson denied an;y knovladp or this agreement. Mr. Dahlgren pointed out that prior to the time that this horIIe was ereoted, the architect called upon Dahlt(r8n and tl1at an alternative driveway bona Al18't .. ouggested. 8111111'11an mewed and 1'ranb 8econded that thi8 action be denied. Hat10n carried unardmously 0 9. I&T'lIR rtOM VILLAGE ATTORtJEY REGARDING PARKI '0 In R-l. A letter tro.l-ir. LottBgurden dated r~ 17, 1960, waa read aloud. The village attorney took the pQ81t1on that the p1'O'rision to require a 2/3 "'Tote of the oounc;;U on1y when 20% ot tile proP81"t47 owners e1gned a written protest was of doubtf'ul val1dity. It was llUg8ated that the Council has to take .. position that to grant the special use permit tor parJd.Dg in R-1, it must either determino that it requires 2/3 or the maj~ity vote in aU cueso Althoucb tbere was no publio hearing on this matter. Chairman Bell permitted serreral ot the r.a1den.t8 l1ri.ng in the area south or the proposed Slawik Shopping Center to coanent. :!r. S~neroden, 1970 n. Asbury spoke against this proposed amendment to the zoning Dl"dinance. He 1nconeot~ stated that this was a I!I11.O'tlball action started by Mr. Slawik's U"Chitect who bad l.fr. Dahlgren' "in hie pocket" and that the planning com1ss1on and ('~U were enowballedo He stated that .~ matter "was aUeut and dzt1ed" and. that "1t .... not aooct praotice to put IIIOft87 111 Hr. Slaw1k' 8 pocket by taking the lIIOI1ey from their pockets a8 property owners". .