pm_600601 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

- 2 - " (- be made a full ~rrdth street. Picbard Radke, 960 Lovell, opposed this action because he u:Lahes to have the area R-l! . and he'Dresented a list of nine (9) families who likmTisEJ oppose; five of thesp familiiaes Previously signed the rezoning petition for Rev. Lundblad, Hr. a.nd ::rs. Art Eri.ckson, Glen Johnson, !?ay !~unsonJ 1-lillal"'d Paterson, and C. H.Lundated. t~embrez moved and Fr8.nke seconded that the rezonin~ be denied on the baDis that as the request was presented Ute action would constitute spot zoning and before :::>.ny land use plan for this area is considered" the area should be platted. 'Totion ce.rrled unall:I.moue1y. 4. PLAT OF ~fOUNT ~TIE\-l ^nT)I'l'I"~r BY .T. HOllUm This action was supported by J. Holrud of 242lt. N. Dale. It is filed in conjunction w:i.th the rezoning request of Dr. Hanson (S). Ur. Holrud pointed out, that. this WllS a. compUcated problem because (1) three families own this land and. the current. plat is t\ compromise. (2) The topography 1s rough and a hill must be mov'ad to the east to fill low land and (3) it is desired to record this plat rep,'Brdlesa ot the action on the Hanson rezoning.. During a thorough discussion with the cormnission, it "laS pointed out that the follo\<ling problem erlated in the ~posed plat. (1) In the aren of the proposed nursing home the topography drops 28 ft. in 132 ft. from the back of the lot to the front of' the l(lta. (2) Center line gradients and profiles for the roads are not listed. on the pllJt. (3) Theee appears to be sorae sub-standard lots of BO f't widih and less than the requ.1.red area. (4) Objections were raised to the placemont of drivE\wG.yo on County T?.oad :9; it was suggeeted. that t.hese lots may have batter aCC&BB frar" t.he urlnor street to the north.. Franke moved and Simerman seconded that the action on t..'1e ple:ii be tabl~d for raasor~c; cited above. f-fotion carried urw.n1mously'. S. REZOT-IING nEQUEST OF DR. HANSON FROM R..l TO 13-1 Description: S 175 It sw-i SW!t of Sec. 12, T 29, R 23, and the ~'l 71~3..3 except the W 488.3 thereofo Purpose~ To erect a nursing home Action~ By peti1iion Dr. J. B. Hanson supported this action. He f.elt tl1.at this "(.~a8 a good area for the establishment of a nursing hOIJleo No plans were Pl'e8antt:~d although 11 hand drawn sketrJ1 was used far illustration. It vas pointed out by the commission members that should such a. request be granted it. would oreate a zon1rl1t situation whereby one would find g....3 at the intersection of Dale and Co. Rd. '8, R-l adjacent to tihe east and B-1 adjacent to R-l on all EJid~BCI r~embre. moved. Simerman seconded thE.t the peti t.ion bs recommendod far den.1.lll on the basis that it would create spot zon1~; carned unanimously.. 6. REZOHIOO REQUEST Br L-Z MP'G. 00.. B-3 to 1!r",1 DeIlcr:1pt1oDa Shady Beach Lots 6-7-0-9 Purpose: To enlarge an exIsting truck body businoB8 A.otioDI B,y pe'b. tion Mr. BWt'e Zeeoe, 1881 tI. Rice St., Vice- President of L-Z J.1rt~. Co. supported this pets. t1on. I,.Z desired to expand. their pre8ent building and were informed by the bu11d1~ inspector . that they were not pem1tted to do so. They are currently in a non-contondng use.. There.wU no opposition to this aotion. Hr. Dehlgren pointed out that perhaps eyen a change 111 a<Zd.ng to 1-1 would not eo1Ye Mr. z.eo.'8 problem. The required set-backs in the 1-1 sone probably would prevent 1'urtber expansion. l.fr. Zeece thJriijjht that the =:J~ classifioation to 1-1 would be dN1rable even if the building couldn' t !I~b.