pm_601102 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

REGULAP MEf~TING OF '['HE ROSIWIIJ1!; PLII'1NING COMMISSION MINUTES ()"I<' OOVEHBE'R 2~ l~bO The meeti.ng waB called to ordt:!r' by Chab"rnan Bell at '!aLO PoMo Commissioners Bell, Franke, G1lles:./ Orauel~ S1rnermanj Solke and Hembrez Wd're present as were Epgineer Soutter and Planner Dahl.p,t-en" Sr."'I'iIK ~)PECll\L U~)i.:; Fl,:prllT (HMi,.HiiH ::)JOj'!'PJI, C].:nhP t'AP'Cl'lG API'~ll) Mr 0 Bell read the conditions 5 tal.ed in thl". report of t.he planner to the Planning Corrm1ssion dated October 26, 1960" The conditione were individually discussed jn thef'oUowing order: Drainur,e, nccess, va(';nt:ion of stl'eet:'l~ street chanp;esJ bufter zones, sodd1.ng, fence, landscape, grades~ lighting" parking and parko Condi tion:3were acceptable e.xcept as follows: Condition sixjI sodd:1ngjl was changed to include 40 feet adjacent to the parklng lot to be maintained and sodded by the ownero Condi lion six1 fence~ shall be si x feet high "cyclone", unbroken and without openings on the buffer 20ne wi thin 3 feet of the parking a'rea 0 C(\ndl- t10n elght, planting shall be 75% opaqueo Condltion twelve ShAll be delete,I, Hro Eo Day 2001 Noo Asbury, and Mro Steneroden were assured that Mr" Sle.wik 1;;- tended to drain ';he area into the county d1 teh on the south aide of Highway J6 without cost to the residentso Mr" Thompson requested 8. 70 fr.:.:ot buffer on the west side of the propertyo Mr" Slawik argued against this but agreed to it if he were required to sod and ma:tn~' tain only the forty feet nearest his parking lot ~= the set~back art"..8 required by ordinanCE':!o Thompson agreed" Dro Swanson requested that the fence be erected between the plantingB and the parking lot as per 11ro Dahlg:renv s sketch" M:r 0 Steneroden presented a 8UJ'IImary of the questionnaire tha t his group had COM= piled; the vote was about 80 to 1 in favor of the contingincies as discussedo There being no further discuB810n on the condi Hans pertain1n~ to grant.1.ng of the special perItti t$ the Chairman opened the meetinR to discussions at' any rlsture relative to this matter. A detailed diSou8sion follOW'ed l'elative to the over~' all storm drainage problem in this areao Mro Sautter and rt-o Dahlgren summarized the entire negotiations that have occured with the state, county and villRf{e Officials relative to this problema Simerman Moved, Grauel Seconded, that the public hearing be continued until November 7, 1960, and that the village planner prepare a corrected listing of the conditions of the special use permit and a corrected plan of the area for disoussion at that time. Motion carried unan:1mous1y5 VACATION OF :fi'F.RNWOOD ( MR. LILLEHAUGEN) Fred Kueppe1's, attorney for Mr. tiUehaugen, presented a replat of the Porte Plat No.2 Addition wherein lots;' and 6 of the old plat win be combined into lot 5 and that a sta-ip or land wiU. be dedicated to provide road acoess to the proposed lot So ,it