pm_640701 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

File 64-210 File 64-211 File 64-212 File 64-206 File 64-204 -2= Setback variance - Baber.., l690 North Hamllne Avenue. Mr. Paul Baber stated that he wanted to operate a garage and sell automobile supplies. He proposed to construct a building 100 feet long and 15 feet high on the north property line. This property is properly zoned for this operation but before a permit is issued the inspector should request a plot plan showing parking area~ location of building. etc. before the permit is granted. Soike moved~ Anderson secondedg that a setback variance be denied. Carried by unanimous vote. Special use permit.., zoning variance and planned development = Willmus Properties. Mr. Daubney representing the owner stated that buildings containing 58 units will be constructed. The owner Willmus said the buildings will be different than the general run in the village. There were several residents within the area who were quite concerned about the elevation and drainagev some were opposed to apartment buildings. Two requests had been made previously to zone this land to a B=3 classi~ fication, both had been denied. It was the feeling of the members of the Planning Commission that the proposed use is reasonableD therefore. Soike moved. Nelson seconded.., that we recommend the approval of the proposed planned residential development and Anderson movedD Soike seconded>> that a special use permit for two story buildings be granted.., all of this on the condition that an opaque fence be constructed along the easterly boundary line of the property. Both motions carried by unanimous vote. Rezoning from I-I to 1-2 property of Willmus. Even though limited in- formation was given by Mr. Daubney representing the owner~ for this requests it was generally agreed that property north of County Road C would conform with other properties now being used by trucking industries and related business. Nelson movedg Soike secondedg that we recommend the approval of this request. Carried by unanimous vote. Setback variance by Richard CooperD 1960 Eldridge. Mrs. Cooper stated they wanted to build a house 65 feet long on an existing lot 15 feet allowing a setback on each side of only 5 feet instead of 10 feet. Mrs. Cooper said the property owners on each side were not opposed. Anderson moveds Sigford seconded.., that the variance be recommended. Carried by unanimous vote. Front yard variance = Murphy Motor Freight. Both Mr. Dudley. attorney and Mr. Selz9 vice president of Murphy Motor Freight who made the request of a 7 foot setback instead of 40 feet as provided in the ordinance stated it was extremely important in the operation of their businessD to be allowed to operate on a 7 foot setbackg it was badly needed for parking their trailers. After due considerationg Nelson movedg Motl secondedg that we recommend the request be denied. The members of the Planning Commission suspected that sooner or later the property across the street (B=2) may be zoned to a commercial or industrial use.., therefore. they might go along with a front yard variance of 20 feet instead of 7 feet as requested. Motion carried by unanimous vote. There being no further businessp Nelson movedg seconded by Soike that the meeting be a~ ourned.