pm_650203 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-2- of the entire area extending to County Road Do The Council, therefore, ordered Midwest Planning to make such a study which at this moment is not yet completed. Under these circumstanceso Nelson moved, Soike seconded, to recommend that the request be denied and inform the Council the reasons for this recommendation. I. There is a problem in the handling of the surface water in this area. 2. The council ordered a report from Banister Engineering firm on the drainage question. This report was submitted and it states that it is not possible to adequately appraise the drainage problem without additional delineation of the future land use question in the drainage area. 3. The council has also requested the Village Planner to prepare a study of the land use problem as it relates not only to the property in question but the area generally to the north up to County Road Do 4. When the land use study has been completed, the engineering consultants will be in a position to make more precise recommendations regarding the drainage as shown within the boundaries on the proposed plan submitted by Banister. s. It wase therefore, the opInIon of the Planning Commission to deny the request at this time and reapply again when the overall land use pattern report and drainage solution report are completed. Motion carried by a unanimous vote. File 64-240 Sheehy Rezoning = Dellwood Avenue between County Road C=2 and Josephine Road from R-l to R-2 and R-3. Mr. Rahn representing the ownero Cyril Sheehy, had originally submitted this rezoning petition on December 20 19640 and again on December 14th and January 69 1965. The matter was laid over these many times because of lack of information on the soil condition and storm drainage in this area. There was also considerable opposition by the majority of property owners within 250 feeto Public Works Director Odland said that a 42 inch pipe line should be installed before Dellwood Avenue is improved and he also read the soil test report which did not prove conclusively that single family homes could not be built in this location. It was finally moved by SigfordD seconded by Lund that we recommend that the request be denied for the following reasons~ I. It was suggested by the petitioner that the principal reason for the rezoning is the poor soil condition reported to exist in this areao It was requested by the Commission that factual data regarding the soil condition be submitted. The tests were submitted but they failed to show conclusively that single residences cannot be built in this platted areao 2. It has been recommended by the Village Engineering Department that a storm sewer line 42 inches be installed before Dellwood Avenue is improvedo The property owners within the area stated they could not stand another assess- ment for storm sewer at this time. 3. There was a concern about the construction of apartment buildings on this property which is surrounded by single family homeso except to the east, not yet developedv but zoned R-I. This could be construed as spot zoning. Carried by unanimous vote.