pm_650707 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Meeting .,. Roseville Planning Commission Wednesday, July 7, 1965 - 7:30 P.M. Members present: JaJlBS Nelson, Anderson, SigfordJ} Remsblrg and Membrez. Also present Dahlgren, Ch-auel and Odland. Remsburg moved, Nelson "seconded to approve the minutes of the June 2nd regular meeting and the June 21st special meeting as submitted. Roll call: Unanimous. File 65-273 Division of a lot - Archie Johnson, 2100 No. Lexington Avenue os after due consideration, Anderson moved, Sigford seconded, to recommend the division of this lot. The corner lot of Lexington and Parker to be 144 ft. and the remaining piece to the east to be 85 ft. subject, however, that 15; ft. be dedicated for future widening of Lexington Avenue. Roll call: Unanimous. File 65-265 Rezoning.from Rl to R3 and development plan .,. Angelo Carbone - property on Hamline Avenue across fran Oakcrest Avenue. Mr. Vogel, attorney for Carbone presented a development p1an which was not satisfactory, even to Mr. Vogel. A misunderstanding seemed to have occurred between Mr. Dahlgren, consultant planner and Mr. Vogel on this new proposal. The fact that plans cost a great deal of money, Mr.. Vogel wanted some assurance that the property will be rezoned before spending up to $12 to $20,000 for complete development plans, b1ild:lng plans~ elevations, etc" It was the oonsensus of opinion that the rezoning and developmmt plans should be considered at the same time, therefore, Nelson moved, Remsburg seconded>> that we recommend the denial of the rezoning. Roll can: Unanimous. File 65-268 Rezoning from 1U to R3 and Development Plans... Northern Aggregates, Inc., property located at southeast corner of Highway 36 and Cleveland Avenue. Mr. Allen Rubel of Northern Aggregates stated that five (5) buildings, mostly one bedroom units will be cons tructed. The buildings will be 2; story high and will be brick veneered. Mr. Oscar Jones spoke of tax benefits for the village. Mr.. Tom Kingdon who had been opposed to rezone at first, spoke and presented mimeographed copies of his reasoning of being in favor of this request now. Many property owners were opposed to granting this rezoning>> such as Dr. Peterson>> Dr.. Raygor, W. F. Spearj) attorney Flaherty. It was the consensus of opinion that the sing Ie family residences were good hODe B, of high values and that the cons truction of apartment buildings could have adverse affects in this area" Nelson moved, Anderson seconded,; we recommend that the request be denied.. Roll callg Unanimous. File 65-275 Division of a lot = Everett Beane, 2714 No.. Dale Street.. After due consideration~ Anderson moved,9 Nelson seconded" that we recommend the division of this lot as follows: the southerly piece to have a frontage of 107 ft on Dale Sto the middle piece to have a frontage of 88 ft on Dale St" the northerly piece to have a frontage of 94.92 ft. on Dale St. These dimensions include a strip of 14.92 ft. to the north of subject property which the petitioner owns 0 Roll call: Unanimous.