pm_650707 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

- 2 - File 65-278 Request by !Jar-Mar for a set back variance and a sign varianceo It was discovered that an error was made in the legal description of the subject property and that the variance cou1d not be considered on the basis of the petitioD!lr's legal descr1l>tion. Anderson move<4 Remsburg seconded, it would be best to withdraw this request and resubmit with correct legal description" The applicant a.greed. Roll ca1lg Unanimous. File 65-279 Set back variance - George Martens, 2020 Skillman Ave. The members of the commission could not see any particular problem in granting a 21 foot set back instead of 30 ft. Therefore, Sigford moved, Remsburg seconded, to recommend the proposed set-backo Roll call~ Unanimous 0 File 65-277 Rezoning from Rl to II - Roberts Construction and Robert Carr, = property southeast corner of Fulham and Terminal Road. Mr. Daubney" attorney representing the owners subnitted a plan of developing this tproperty with two bui1din gs to be us ed for warehousing. The plan didn't show details of the par1dng layout, access,\) etc.. The industrial classifies. tion when situated next to residential must set back 100 ft. of which 60 ft. can be used for parking and the balance of 40 ft. to be landscaped. The proposed plans indicated the parking to be as close as less than 10 ft. on the south side which is in violation of the code. The property own!rs residing on Highway 36 represented by Pat Flaherty, attorneyJ' were opposed to anything but residential use. The plan submitted would bring the parking, loading, etco closer to the homes. The proposed plans being :in violation of tile code with respect to set-backs,\) Sigford moved, Anderson seconded.\! we recommend that the request be denied. 'Roll calh Unanimous. File 65-276 Rezoning, Development Plans and Preliminary Plat. Richard Farr,l) property at the northeast corner of Dale & County Road B.. The proposed plans were so incomplete that 1.t was difficult to consider this request, therefore. Anderson moved>> Nelson seoonded,9 that the matter be continued to the next meeting in August. The applicant agreed to come up with some better prepared plans. Roll callg Unanimous. File 65-282 Division of a lot - Lloyd Huberty, 2555 Victoria" This request being an unreasonable one and not at all practical from the standpoint of good planning, Nelson moved, Sigford seconded, tQ recommend the denial of this request. Roll calh Unanimous.