My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_670105
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
196x
>
1967
>
pm_670105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:31:38 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 6:30:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/5/1967
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />\, <br /> <br />Regular ~,keting Roseville Planning COJ.lmission <br />Thursday~ January 5~ 1967 - 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />j\le:nbers pl'esent: <br />Also present: <br /> <br />Linebarger~ Anderson. NelsonD Pope and Remsburg. <br />DahlgrenD OdlandD Kluegel and Grauel <br /> <br />On motion by Remsburg. seconded by Nelson~ the minutes of the regular meeting of <br />December 7th were approved as submitted. <br /> <br />Subject File 366-66 - Proposed transmission line to be constructed by Northern States <br />Power Company along the Northern Pacific and Minnesota Transfer Railway tracks. <br /> <br />Northern S\:ates Power Company had previously requested more time to present its <br />proposal so it was mov~d by Pope and seconded by Remsburg that we hold this over until <br />our next meeting or set up a special meeting. It was then moved by Nelson and seconded <br />by Remsburg that we call a special meeting for January 30 ~ 1967 at 7: 30 P. M. Roll <br />call for both \vere unanimous. <br /> <br />Subject File 362-66 - Petition by service station operators in the Village for an <br />ordinance restricting signs around service station enterpriseso <br /> <br />Petitioner requested that this be continued until our next regular meeting because <br />of a death in Hr. Wendland's (attorney for service station operators) family 0 It was <br />so moved by Anderson and seconded by Popeo Roll Call~ unanimous. <br /> <br />Subject File 364-66 - H. & Val J. Rothschild - Vacation of Terrace Drive between <br />Hamline and Hurono <br /> <br />About 20 residents were on hand to hear Mr. John Daubney~ attorney for H. & Val Jo <br />Rothschild. present the plans for this piece of propertyo Mrs. Lincoln. 1321 West <br />County Road C-2 appeared to be the only one opposed to the vacation of the street. <br />She claimed the traffic \Vould increase at the corner of C=2 and HUl"on. Our planner <br />pointed out that not only could the property now zoned R=3 be developed betterD without <br />being cut in half by a public street~ this street (Terrace Drive) would possibly cause <br />problems with our traffic movements at the Hamline Shopping Center. He also stated that <br />a well done development on the R-3 property would tend to screen the shopping center from <br />the residential neighborhood behind. It was moved by Pope and seconded by Nelson that <br />\Ve recommend approval of this vacation provided the petitioner grant easement ror storm <br />sewer at no cost to the Village. Roll CallD unanimous. <br /> <br />Subject File 363=66 - H. & Val J. Rothschild = rezoning request from R=2 to R=6 (area <br />near Hamline Shopping Center) 0 <br /> <br />Mr. John Daubney presented preliminary plans of a planned unit development for the <br />area showing t\vO apartment structures and a closed swimming pool in the "R=3" area and <br />townhouses in the area under consideration for rezoning. M::, Weitzman and his <br />architect explained the parkingD material on the garagesD ingress and egress to the <br />property. densitYD etc. None of the 20 residents on hand spoke in favor of the p:;:,;)ject. <br />Hro Dick Flesher. 2774 Huron~ was opposed to townhouses because they would create a <br />traffic problem and he felt that promises had been made in the past by the property owner <br />that double bungalows would be built on the R=2 property. Mr. Howard McDurmetD 2866 HuronD <br />opposed the rezoning. Mr. Don Strobeck D 1297 IV. County Road C=2 was opposed because storm <br />sewer assessments would have to be paid by him before the property could be developed. <br />~;r. Ed Galle. 2755 North Dell\vood~ also opposed the rezoning. Upon request of the <br />developer it was moved by Remsburg and seconded by Nelson that we lay this matter over <br />until the regular meeting of April 5th to see if the storm sewer problem is solvedo <br />Roll Call. unanimouso <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.