pm_680207 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3- Ques tions \~ere as follO\~s: why should it take three years to do the buildin~. will the apartment shortage last that long, size of the property, arc 3 story buildings allowed in the code, what about the dirt and water, children, se\vers. landscape, no more buffers needed for the service station, etc. A resolution that was passed by the Republicans in Precinct I requesting no more apartments in Precinct 1 was presented. Mr. Bossard stated that a storm water easement is on file. It is dated February 5, 1954, and is No. 132-6575. It was moved by Carpenter and secbnded by Remsburg that we recommend the Council authorize a storm sewer feasibility study to be paid for by the applicant if storm sewer project is not approved and the applicant file a preliminary plat to be acted on concurrently with the zoning and planned unit development approval. Zoning hearing to be adjourned to our next regular meeting. Roll Call: Ayes (6) - Nays (1) - Demos voting no. Subject File 395-67 ~ 6 .......... ~ . ... "- ~ . ~ . Wewers vacation of Ida Avenue between County Road B~2 and Grandview. After discussion it was felt that the distance from Rice Street to the first access south from County Road B was too great. When the property to the North developed it was felt that an access to the park would be required. It was moved by Carpenter and seconded by Pope that we recommend the Council deny this request for vacation of street. Roll Call: unanimous. Subject File 406-67 ~ . .. 1 .. . ~ . Robert Long request for rezoning from R-l to R-2 at 2239 St. Stephens Street. TI1e plans called for a double bungalow that would be 96' x 32' or 34' with two bede rooms in each unit. The overhang would be 30'. TI1e lot is l29' in width. Discussion centered around the fact that this area is single family now and has a lot of nice homes. It was pointed out that more requests could come in for rezoning if this one is approved. It was moved by Edlund and seconded by Anderson that we recommend that the Council deny this request for rezoning. Roll Call: unanimous. Subje~t Fi}e 42~~?~ Ban-Con, Inc. variance at 247 Capi tol Vie\~ Ci rcle. Because Ban-Con owns all the property around subject home it was moved by Edlund and seconded by Remsburg that we recommend approval of the request for a ten foot variance to the rear lot line. Roll Call: unanimous. Subject File 422-68 ~ ,,~.....~. ".~- Village of New Brighton. Consideration of rezoning from Iel to R-3 for the property contiguous to the Village of Roseville at the northwest corner of County Road D and Old Highway 8. After discussion it was moved by Pope and seconded by Anderson that we recommend the Council go on record as having no objection to the rezoning proposed. Roll Call: unanimous. Subject File 400-67 Roseville Funeral Home at Snelling and County Road Co It was moved by Pope and seconded by Anderson that we recommend to the COlmcil that this request be allowed to be withdrawn. Roll Call: unanimous.