My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_690205
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
196x
>
1969
>
pm_690205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:31:43 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 6:30:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/5/1969
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />'.=0 ,,", '.~"" <br /> <br />Subject File 498~69 .~ Ben Freeman rezoning and special Lise permit at 485 !"est Larpentf;tU" <br />~"" .~ ~~ r', T Avenue <br /> <br />;\11', John lJaubney stated that there would be 144 units (72 one bedroom and 72 two <br />bedroom) on 8,7 acres of land (379~OOO sqo ft,). This is 76,630 more square feet <br />than required by tha ordinance" There would be 144 underground garages: and 1<14 sure <br />face parking stalls" The request fits in th the 701 program" The four owners wlthu\ <br />250 of this property didnf t voice any objections to this requestc The estimated cost <br />would be $12~OOO per unit with the rental X"imge from $170 to $225" They do not have: thd,:t <br />plans drawn up yet" Mr. Eiders of 504 Glenwood satJ that they had a petition from the <br />last hearing and wanted to know if that was still OUT answer \.,as no. He wanted <br />to know why not put houses in here. He \vas against r;i!e rezoning, Jack Tschida~ .512 <br />Glenwood~ 'I/anted to kno\v why we ask them to deciJe ,.hat to do with the property" He is <br />against the rezoning and will get a new petition if necessary, Mr. Gene Aucki! ~d6 <br />Glenwood~ was against the rezoning, He said that apartments here would be a creeping <br />cancero <br /> <br />It was moved by Edlund and seconded uJ'" Carpenter that we lay this request over until <br />they come in with a planned residential unit deve lopment pIano Roll Call: unani mous, <br /> <br />SUl1ject File 4~9~69 ~ Clara Gribble = preliminary plat at County Road and Arthur Place <br />__...b-6....l>-.L .e. ~~ - ...4" <br /> <br />~Ir, Curt Nelson stated that Mrs, Gribble wanted to sell the lots, It \.,as pointed out <br />that the house facing County Road D had been sold using ametes "nd bounds description, <br />This is violating the Village of RoseviUe ordinance <I <br /> <br />It was moved by Anderson and seconded by Edlund that we lay this over so that Mrs, <br />Gribble could see if she could include the e1tire tract in the preliminary plat, Roll <br />Call: unanimous. <br /> <br />Subject File 500=69 = Tolstad! 5 Rosedale Addition preliminary plato <br />~~~~ -- ~~ <br /> <br />Edlund moved and Pope seconded that He recommend to the Council that they approve this <br />request subject to the dedication of ten (10) feet on Rosela\VH and that the Engineer <br />approve the drainage plano Roll Cal.l: unanimous, <br /> <br />Subject File 501=69 = Dayton Development Company approval:\f preliminary plat <br />~lI4rtt~"""-,,, .."... f.....'- <br /> <br />l.1r, Ivinger of Chicago and Mr, John Abbott of Dayton Development Corporation presented <br />plans that would have Lovell as an east=\~est street par:dlel to Highway 36 and have Prior <br />Avenue as the north=south stl"eetc The intersec dons at I"view should be signali zed <br />wi thin a couple of years so that this would help the trHfL.c problem, After discussion <br /> <br />It was moved by Demos and seconded by Pope that \.,e recommend to the Council that they <br />accept the preliminary plans with the e limina tion of the easterly 250 U portion of Love 11 <br />tHat would be west of Fairview, Roll Call Ayas (5) <~~ Nays (1) ~ Edlund opposinp> <br /> <br />There being no further business it \"as moved by Demos and seconded by Anderson that \>Ie <br />adj ourn 0 Roll Call, unanimous" Time: 10: 40 p" m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submi tteJ, <br /> <br />Cameron Anderson" Secretar)" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.