pm_690604 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission June 4, 1969 The regular meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission of June 4, 1969, was called to order at 7:35 P.M. Commission Members Present - Demos, Eagles, Edlund, Johnson, Pope, Chairman Membrez Others Present - Councilman Grauel, Consultant Planner Dahlgren, Assistant Manager Sills Commission Member Absent - Carpenter Others Absent - Public Works Director Goldberg Edlund Moved, Eagles Seconded, that the minutes of the May 7, 1969 be approved as submitted. Roll Call, Ayes: Eagles, Edlund, Johnson, Pope and Membrez. Nays: None. Abstentions: Demos, Planning File 510-69 Minnesota Highway Department request for renaming of St. Croix I Street north of T.H. 36 Presentation This matter was brought to the attention of the Planning Commission at their last meeting of May 7, 1969, with the intent that the Commission members would return to this meeting with several suggestions for the renaming of St. Croix Street. The State High- way Department feels that the present designation of St. Croix Street would be ineffective in directing traffic into the area which is served primarily by industrial property. Discussion Some of the Commission members made the following suggestions: Computer Drive, Roserail Road, Enterprise Road, Industrial Center Road. In view of the long agenda for tonight's meeting, it was requested that the Commission members come back at their next meeting in July with more suggestions for the renaming of St. Croix Street. Recommendation Chairman Membrez reqaested that this item be held over one more month with the understanding that the Commission members would once again submit suggestions for the renaming of St. Croix Street, Plann~ng File 512-69 - William Stenger request for division of a lot at 1190 Oakcrest Presentation Mr. William Stenger indicated that he would like to subdivide his lots from the present two lots to three lots with frontage of approximately 88.72 feet each. He also indicated that the width at the rear of the lots would be 50.33 feet each. Each of the lots would exceed the minimum 11,000 square foot density requirement for interior lots. Discussion Mr. Joseph Kocour, 1176 Oakcrest, indicated that there was a private deed restriction on this proposed property which indicated that there should be one single family residence for Lot 11 and one single family residence for Lot 12 of Block 5, T. N. Connor Plat. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that this was a private restriction on the deed and that the Village should rule in relationship to our ordinances and our standards , whether or not the Commission thinks that these lots should be divided. The private restrictions would have to be worked out between the parties involved and, therefore, would not involve the Village.