Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission ~~eting <br />Wednesday, November 5, 1969 <br /> <br />The regular Planning Commission meeting of November 5, 1969, was called <br />to order at 7:35 P.M. <br /> <br />Commission Members Present: <br />Others present: <br /> <br />Johnson, Demos, Edlund, Membrez. <br />Councilman Grauel, Consultant Planner Dahlgren, <br />Public Works Director Goldberg, Inspection Superintendent <br />Kluege 1, Assistant Vi 11age Manager 5i 11s. <br /> <br />Commission Members Absent: <br /> <br />Pope, Carpenter and Eag les <br /> <br />Edlund Moved, Demos Seconded, that the minutes of the October 1, 1969 regular <br />meeting be approved as submitted. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Demos, Edlund and Membrez. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Edlund Moved, Demos Seconded, that the minutes of the special meeting of October 9, 1969, <br />be approved as submitted. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Demos, Edlund and Membrez. Nays: <br />None. <br /> <br />Planning File 549-69 - Edwin J. Kuhne request for approval of pre liminary plat, IVoodlyn <br />Court Addition at approximately 3047 Woodlyn Court. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. John Daubney, Attorney representing Mr. Edwin Kuhne, indicated they had met with the <br />Roseville Park and Recreation Board at their last regular meeting. Mr. Daubney requested <br />that the report of the Park and Recreatim Board be read and made a part of the record. The <br />report indicated that the Park and Recreation Board was sti 11 interested in acquiring the <br />entire portion of land owned by Mr. Kuhne as shown in the "701 Program". However, the report <br />indicated that no funds were available for the purchase of this property at this time. <br />Secondly, the report indicated that the Park and Recreation Board would recommend denying any <br />exchange of property as proposed by Mr. Kuhne. Mr. Daubney indicated that in view of this <br />report from the Park and Recreation Board, perhaps Mr. Kuhne could now consider some other <br />method of developing this property. He indicated that the only possible way was to have <br />street access off Woodlyn Avenue. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Membrez indicated that the Commission was in a position to make a recommendation on the <br />preliminary plat as originally submitted by Mr. Kuhne and that the Commission would not like <br />to consider any alternative proposals at this time. He felt that the Commission should make <br />a recommendation to the Village Council based on the report from the Park and Recreation <br />Board and that the final decision on any exchange of property would have to be made by the <br />Village Council. Mr. Daubney indicated that he was in complete agreement with this and that <br />he would like to appear before the Village Council with the idea of some possible exchange of <br />property to completely develop this preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Edlund Moved, Demos Seconded that we recommend that the request of Edwin J. Kuhne for <br />approval of preliminary plat of Woodlyn Court at approximately 3047 Woodlyn Court be denied, <br />Roll Call~ Ayes: Johnson, Demos, Edlund, Membrez. Nays: None. <br />