My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_691203
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
196x
>
1969
>
pm_691203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:31:45 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 6:30:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/3/1969
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Meeting <br />Wednesday, December 3, 1969 - 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />The regular Planning Commission meeting of December 3, 1969, was called <br />to order at 7:36 P.M. <br /> <br />Commission members present: Eagles, Demos, Edlund, Johnson, Pope, Membrez <br />Others present: Consultant Planner D~llgren, Inspection Superintendent Kluegel, <br />Assistant Village Manager Sills <br />Others absent: Councilman Grauel, Public Works Director Goldberg <br /> <br />Edlund Moved, Pope Seconded, that the minutes of November 5, 1969, regular meeting <br />be approved subject to changing the name of Mr. Daubney to Mr. Dahlgren on Page 3, <br />last paragraph of the November 5, 1969 minutes. Roll Call, Ayes: Demos, Edlund, <br />Johnson, Pope, Membrez. Nays: None. Abstentions: Eagles. <br /> <br />Planning File 541-69 - Bristol Company, Inc. request for rezoning from R-l to R-3A <br />and special use permit at 3030 North Cleveland Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. David Bennett, Architect representing the Bristol Company, Inc., displayed a number <br />of drawings and charts which indicated the site plan of the proposed apartments. He <br />indicated that the Bristol Company in choosing this site felt that it had good access <br />to Cleveland Avenue and would produce a good internal traffic pattern in the proposed <br />project. He indicated that a total of 126 apartments units could be placed o~ this site <br />and still meet the density requirements of the Village Code. However, he is proposing <br />98 units and requests rezoning for that density requirement. Therefore, the applicant <br />is proposing to move the property line of the rezoned area 126 feet south of the present <br />north boundary. He also indicated that there would be an additional 43 feet more from <br />this property line where the first building would be constructed. The total of these <br />two would produce 170 feet setback or buffer strip from the present north property line. <br />There would be a total of 198 parking units with 72 spaces underground, 25 spaces en- <br />closed and a 101 spaces on the site. The exterior of the building would be a combination <br />of wood material and brick. The applicant requested that the requested rezoning is for <br />a total of 235,200 square feet. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Pope had a question as to the exterior treatment of the apartment building. It <br />was answered that the treatment would be of the split shakes and brick material. <br />Mrs. Demos had a question as to the height of the apartment building. It was indicated <br />that they would be 2 and 3 stories complementing the grade change in the site. <br />Mr. Membrez had a question as to the elevation of the site and as to whether or not it <br />was the same grade as that of Cleveland Avenue. It was indicated that the elevation at <br />the northeast corner is 923 feet sloping to the first building site with a grade of 911 <br />feet. Mr. Johnson had a question as to what will happen with the 170 foot buffer area to <br />the north of the proposed apartment buildings, as to whether or not this property would <br />be left to open space area, or would the applicant propose to develop single family homes <br />around the cuI de sac on Wilder Street. Mrs. Demos asked a question as to whether or not <br />the Bristol Company intended to build, own and operate this particular apartment develop- <br />ment. The applicant answered this question in the affirmative. <br /> <br />There was a question as to the Wilder Street cuI de sac and that it should be the <br />responsibility of the developer to construct this particular turn-around. At this <br />point the applicant \"as requested whether or not he would be willing to construct a <br />"T" shape cuI de sac as indicated in the plans. The applicant answered this question <br />also in the affirmative. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.