pm_700701 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

=2= Planning File 566-70 - Jell and Associates request for amended special use 'permit at 2450 North Cleveland Avenue \ Hr. Loftsgaarden, representing Jell and Associates, presented a site plan which showed 182 rentals and 444 parking spaces, The plan is based on no road dedication at all, Mr. Lametti was present and claimed he did not wish to dedicate or sell to Mr. Loftsgaarden 33 feet north of Loftsgaarden's property to move the road over and Mr. Lametti also stated that he had no use for the road if Prior Avenue itself were to go through, Mr. Loftsgaarden stated Jell and Associates would be willing to dedicate Prior Avenue and would it not be possible at this time perhaps to put in a dead end road. ~Ir. Goldberg stated that making Prior a dead end road was not at all desirable, The development of Prior depended on whether or not the railroad would put in a crossing on Prior, If the railroad would allow a crossing on Prior then the road could be fully developed. Mr. Darling also agreed that making Prior a dead end road was not a good idea, Mr. Loftsgaarden accused the Planning Commission of an unauthorized use of Village authority by insisting on the easement of 33 feet for a road that no one in the area wantso The motel is ready to be built now and the value of the motel to the Village is consider= ably more than a 33 foot easement. Pope Moved, Edlund Seconded, that the request of Jell & Associates be laid over until the next meeting of the Planning Commission so that a legal opinion can be obtained from the Village Attorney as to whether or not the Village has the authority to require the easement, Ayes: Kellett, Johnson, Pope, Edlund, Eagles, Membrezo Nays: Demos. Planning File 580 - 70 - ViewCon Preliminary Plat, rezoning, special use permits and . Variances at l700 Highway 36 Mr. Darrell Farr was representing View Con and gave a brief history of the project, Allied Stores had agreed to dedicate 30 feet on Herschel Street at the present time, There has been an agreement by Mr. Farr that they would dedicate 50 feet on the north, 30 feet north of Laurie Road and would be willing to landscape this area instead of simply widening the road. They have also agreed to a dedication of lO feet for the widening of Coun ty Road B. At this time Mr. Membrez requested that ~1r. Farr obtain from the Allied Stores the necessary papers to show that in effect they are willing to dedicate the 30 feet for Herschel at the present time. Dr. Mundt, 1856 Gluek Lane, asked a question involving the traffic increase on County Road B that would occur as a result of this development. It was estimated at this time by View Con representatives that from ISOO to 2000 cars a day would probably be the maximum volume traffic in the area. Dr. Mundt requested an explanation on what a three year plan meant? Mr. Farr at this time said it was 3 years for completion and this also included phase 3. lie stated phase 3 would go through if everything went as planned and as long as the demand for the office space continued to be good within the area. Mr. Dennis Gilbertson of Midlothian Road asked a question about the parking in the area and how much was involved. Mr. Farr explained that all parking in the apartment complex would be within the complex itself and not around the outside. One parking space per unit would be underground. In phase 3 the parking would be behind the office buildings. Dr, Mundt raised the question if any provisions were going to be made for children who at the present time were crossing from County Road B to Rosedale, would sidewalks be put in which would allow the chi 1dren safe passage through the same area. He felt consideration