pm_701104 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Meeting Nednesday, November 4, 1970 The November 4, 1970, meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Membrez at 7:30 P.M. Johnson, Demos, Pope and Membrez. Edlund arrived at 7:45 P.M. Kellett and Eagles Councilman Gale Linebarger, Public Works Director Sherman Goldberg, Inspection Superintendent Ernie Kluegel, Midwest Planning represent- ative John Darling and Administrative Assistant Steve North. Mr. Pope Moved and Mr. Johnson Seconded, that the minutes of the meeting of October 7, 1970, be approved as presented. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Demos, Pope and Membrez. Nays: None. Members present: Members absent: Others present: Planning File 587-70 - Victor Vik preliminary plat, Vik Addition at 2200 Fulham Street Presentation Mr. Vik indicated his willingness to divide the property into three lots of 130 feet width rather than the four lots as he originally proposed. Discussion J Mr. Emerson, 2275 Nest County Road B, Mr. Domeier, 2283 West County Road B and Mr. Murma, 2263 West County Road B, presented a proposed plat for the Vik area. Mr. Emerson indicate, that their proposal was only preliminary in nature and certainly open to modification. Mr. Domeier stated that he was most concerned about the placement of Fulham Street and les~ concerned about the width of the lots. Mr. Membrez felt that the issue had been postponed long enough and that Mr. Vik was entitlt to a decision. Recanmendation Mr. Johnson Moved and Mr. Pope Seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of the Vik preliminary plat at 2200 Fulham Street with four 97 foot in width lots, subject to the establishment of sanitary sewer and drainage easements as prescribed by the Village of Roseville engineering department. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Demos, Pope, Edlund and Membrez. Nays: None. ~anning File 591-70 - Fridholm Construction Company request for sign variance at 1076 County Road 8 Presentation Paul Magnuson, representing Fridholm Construction Company, indicated that the present sign at the Miss Swiss Superette is 30 feet back from the street right-of-way as required by thl ordinance. He requested that Fridholm be permitted to move the sign to within S f~. ,f thl right-of-way and also to move it adjacent to the west property line. The variance is needl if the sign is to be effective in drawing customers. Mr. Magnuson stated that gross sales at this store are 50% below that of other stores in the chain and he felt that a major fac' was that the sign cannot be seen because of the building on the west and the trees on the. Discussion Mr. Edlund felt that S feet was too close to the right-of-way and proposed that a variance nf Ie;. TAAT hA ""'''t\TA~ ",h-l...h ",^,,1..1 ...1........ +h... ..4..... -I.. ~.,.^..+ ^~ +h... 1....4 LH..... ^.. +h.. ..1....+ .....,.1