pm_710602 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Rosevil1e Planning Commission Meeting Wednesday, June 2, 1971 The JlD1e 2, 1971, meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was called to order by Chaiman M;!mbrez at 7: 30 P oM. Members Present: ~mos, Johnson, Pope, Eagles and Membrez. Edlund arrived at 7:35 P.M. and Kellett arrived at 7:40 PoM. Members Absent: None Others Present: Councilman Albert Grauel, Public Works Director Shennan Goldberg, Midwest Planning representative Dick Dynell and Administrative Assistant Steve North Mrs. ~mos Moved and Mr. Jolmson Seconded, that the minutes of the meeting of May 5, 1971 be approved with the following aJrendJrent: "Page 4, Planning File 623-71 - Recommendation: The Planning Commission reconurends also that the Comcil direct the Village Planning Consultant to give a report which would include a review of the shopping center from the beginning to the present. This report should be available for the June 1971 meeting. . . .Add the following ... In addition the Dayton ~ve1opnent Company should bring in plans showing the ultimate developnent of the Rosedale Shopping Centero Roll Call, Ayes: I:emos, Jolmson, Pope, Eagles and ~~mbrez. Nays: None . Planning File 620-71 - Arlington Properties request for rezoning from R-l to R-3 and Special Use Permit at 2995 Troseth Road Presentation Mr. Dick Sags tet ter, representing Arlington Properties, indicated that the presentatioo had been made at the last Planning Commission neeting and that he would be happy to answer any questions that the Commission might have. Discussioo Mr. M;!mbrez stated that the main objection at the last meeting seeIOOd to be the traffic problem which would be created by the additional apartment mits. Mr. Sagstetter indicated that the traffic on Troseth Road is not really a problem and that there was little travel on Troseth other than the present residents. He agreed that the additional apartment units would increase the traffic flow but he felt it would not create any problems. Mrs. ~mos stated that she would like to see a townhouse development on the property rather than apartIOOnts. Mr. Sagstetter replied that he personally felt it would not be economically feasible to develop townhouses on the site. Mr. Don Highlander, 2925 Troseth Road, represented the residents. He indicated that the residents are opposed to the apartment development for the following reasons: 1. Safety for our children. The area presently does not have sidewalks and the increased traffic would in turn increase the hazzards to the children in the area.