Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rosevi11e Planning Commission Minutes <br />November 3, 1971 <br /> <br />The November 3, 1971, regular meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was called <br />to order by Chainnan Membrez at 7: 35 P.M. <br /> <br />Members present: <br />Members absent: <br />Others present: <br /> <br />Pope, Demos, Kellett, Edltmd and Hembrez. Eagles arrived at 7:40 PM. <br />Johnson <br />COlU1cilman Albert Grauel, Assistant Village Engineer Dick Skalicky, <br />Midwest Planning Representative Dick Dwinell and Administrative Assist= <br />ant Steve North. <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br /> <br />Mrs. Demos moved and Mr. Kellett seconded that the minutes of the regular meeting of <br />October 6, 1971, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes: Pope, Demos, Kellett and Membrez. <br />Nays: None. Abstentions: Edlt.n1d. <br /> <br />Planning File 656-71 - Garden Development Company request for variance to sign ordinance <br />at 1255 1Vest Larpenteur Avenue <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Shaw, Garden Development Company, indicated that the fi nn was requesting a <br />variance from the 25 foot height limitation and the 100 sq. ft. area limitation pro= <br />vided in the code for pylon signs. He stated that the proposed sign would be approxi= <br />mately 180 sq. ft. in area and be 31 feet in height. Hr. Shaw indicated that the top <br />6 feet of the sign could be removed and therefore be within code limitation. However, <br />he felt that the rerova1 of that portion would spoil the design and the desired effect of <br />the sign. The sign has been designed in such a way as to compliment the building. He <br />stated that the portion of the sign which would be 8 feet above grolU1d level would not have <br />any parking places by it and it would all be landscaped arolU1d the sign. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Eagles indicated that it did not appear to be a hardship case and that the sign could <br />readily be designed to comply with the code. lIe felt that 25 feet was high enough for <br />placement on Larpenteur Avenue. !-1r. Membrez felt that if the top portion of the sign were <br />removed that the total effect desired would be spoiled. Mr. Ed1lU1d felt that the variance <br />should be granted. <br /> <br />Recommenda tion <br /> <br />Mr. EdllU1d moved and Mrs. Demos seconded that the Commission recommend approval of <br />Garden Development Company's request for variance to sign ordinace at 1255 West Larpenteur <br />Avenue. Roll Call, Ayes: Pope, Demos, Edlund and Membrez. Nays: Eagles and Kellett. <br /> <br />Planning File 642= 71 . Royal Oldsmobile request for variance to sign height at 2800 <br />Long Lake Road <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Jean Parranto, representing Royal Oldsmobile, indicated that he is requesting a <br />height variance for two signs; one of which is proposed to be 47 feet above grade level <br />and the other 36 feet above grade at the base of the sign. The Village Code pennits a <br />height of no more than 25 feet. Mr. Parranto stated that the elevation where the 47 <br />foot sign would be located was 904 feet, The elevation of the freeway is 913 feet, <br />therefore, the sign is 9 feet below the freeway. Mr. Parranto felt by having the 47 <br />foot sign that two things would be accomplished; one ,getting a high enough elevation <br />so that the sign could be seen readily from the freeway; two, the sign would not be <br />cutting off visibility of the White Truck finn located to the south. <br />