pm_720405 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-4- Mr. Roberts replied in the affirmative. Mr. French also indicated that he felt that Roseville has all the apartments that we need at the present time. Mr. V. Johnson stated that he was not particularly impressed with the design of the proposed building. Mr. Membrez asked if the developer would consider more landscaping on the westerly portion of the property to screen the apartment building from the residential area. Mr. Roberts indicated that he would certainly be willing to comply with that request. Mr. Kellett indicated that he would like to see additional landscaping plans to include location, size and number of trees and shrubs. He, therefore, recommended that the application be continued until the next meeting. Mr. Pope indicated that he would like to see more specifics as to the exterior of the building. Recommendation Mr. Kellett Moved and Mr. V. Johnson Seconded, that Paul Roberts' request for special use permit for a three story building in B-1 zoning within 150 feet of a residence, multiple family in B-1 district and multiple family over 24 units at 2075 Rice Street, be laid over until the next regular Commission meeting. Roll Call, Ayes: G. Johnson, V. Johnson, Membrez, Demos, Eagles, Kellett and Pope. Nays: None. Planning File 675 - Preliminary Plat, Kline Industrial Park, 2800 Long Lake Road Presentation Mr. Jean Parranto appearing on behalf of the applicant indicated that the plat had been provided to the Commission and he would be happy to answer any questions they might have. Discussion Mr. Goldberg indicated that when Interstate 35 W was constructed a bridge was proposed over the highway at County Road C-2. In line with that pro- posal, the right-of-way on the north side of County Road C-2 was obtained. However, the right-of-way on the south side of C-2 was not obtained. Because of the uncertainty of whether the bridge will ever be constructed, it is recommended that an agreement similar to the one with the Holiday Inn people be completed. This agreement would indicate that in the event the easement were needed for the construction of the bridge, that the Village would not be required to pay damages to the property owner over and above the cost of the value of the property. Mr. Parranto felt that the possibility of a bridge being constructed at that location was very remote, primarily because County Road C-2 ends at Fairview and is not a thru street. He also questioned the need for the agreement since the construction of the bridge remains such an uncertainty.