pm_720607 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISS June 7, 1972 The June 7, 1972, regular meeting of the Rosevil1e Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Pope at 7:30 P.M. MINUTES Members present: Membrez, Demos, G. Johnson and Pope. V. Johnson arrived at 7:40 P.M. Eagles arrived at 9:00 P.M. Kellett arrived at 10:00 P.M. Members absent: None. Others present: Councilman Albert Grauel, Assistant Village Engineer Dick Skalicky, Midwest Planning Representative Dick Dwinell and Administrative Assistant Steve North. Approval of Minutes Mr. Membrez moved and Mr. G. Johnson seconded, that the minutes of the regular Commission meeting of May 3,1972, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes: Membrez, Demos, G. Johnson and Pope. Nays: None. Planning File 689 - Roseville State Bank request for amendment to special use permit and variance to front and side yard setbacks at 1470 County Road B. Presentation A letter was received from the Roseville State Bank requesting that their application be postponed until the regular Corrmission meeting in July. Recorrmendation Mr. Membrez moved and Mr. G. Johnson seconded, that the Roseville State Bank request for amendment to special use permit and variance to front and side yard setbacks at 1470 County Road B be laid over until the next regular Commission meeting. Roll Call, Ayes: Membrez, Demos, G. Johnson and Pope. Nays: None. Planning File 690 - Study of Noise Level at the Interchange of Highways 36, 280 and 35W. Presentation Mr. William Merritt, State Highway Department District 9 Engineer and Mr. Ga~y Orliech, Noise Specialist of the State Highway Department appeared before the Commission. Mr. Orliech indicated that the Highway Department is continuing to study the noise pollu- tion problem that exists at this interchange and at present, is giving particular attention to two alternative solutions to the rroblem. 1) The establishment of two w~ls utilizing existing right-of-way. 2) Construction of an earth-berm which would require the purchasing of additional ri ght-of-way. Either of these alternates would assure a noise level below 70 decimels, at least 90 per- cent of the time. Discussion Mrs. Bill Davenport inquired as to the differences in cost of the two estimates. Mr. Orliech indicated that the earth berm would cost approximately three times what the erection of the two-wall system would cost. Mrs. Kidd, 2224 Eustis, felt that consideration should be given to building the walls or the earth berm high enough to protect the second stories of homes in the area. She inquired as to whether consideration has been given to a combined wall/earth berm project.