pm_730103 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-2- Mr. Pope stated that the future land use of this residential property is unlalown at the present time, but the possibility exists that changes in land use could occur in the next few years. He expressed concern about pennitting the division of the lot in this particular neighborhood, but since the potential purchaser was aware of the situation in the area, that he would not be opposed to the division. Mr. V. Johnson also indicated his concern about dividing the lot in this neighborhood, and asked that the C01.IDcil be made aware that the applicant stated he was willing to increase the north-south length of the northern parcel from 110 feet to 120 feet. Recommendation Mr. Eagles moved and Mr. Kellett seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of Frank Modjeska's request for division of lot at 2295 Highway 36. Roll Call, Ayes: Demos, Eagles, Kellett, V. Johnson and Pope. Nays: None. Planning File 730 - Study of Noise Level at the Interchange of Highway 36-280-35W (north side) Discussion Mr. North stated that he had talked to Kermit McCrae, Assistant Engineer, State Highway Department District 9. Mr. McCrae indicated that the Highway Department would be willing to conduct noise tests in the Spring and &mnner of 1973 to determine the sources of noise in the area. Mr. McCrae also stated that the Highway Department was very interested in what the fut- ure land use for the residential neighborhood on the north side of 36 would be. Mr. Pope requested that the Village staff report back to the Planning Commission on the status of the noise tests at the April 1973 meeting, and that the Highway Department could present the results of their investigation at the May Planning Corrnnission meeting. Recommendation Mr. Eagles moved and Mrs. Demos seconded, that the Study of Noise Level at the inter- section of Highways 36-280-35W (north side) be laid over until the regular April, 1973 Camnission meeting. Roll Call, Ayes: Demos, Eagles, Kellett, V. Jolmson and Pope. Nays: None. Planning File 728 - Connnercial Parking Requirements Discussion Mr. Dwinell summarized the report which he had prepared on commercial parking require- ments. Mr. V. Jo1mson indicated that he was in general agreement with the Barton Asrnnann Consulting firm formula which had been developed for the Dayton Hudson Corporation with the exception that a retail development containing 25,000 square feet or less would not require 7 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. He felt that because of the small size, that approximately 5.5 spaces would be sufficient. The Barton Ashmann fonnula establishes a parking ratio of 7 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the first 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area; 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet for the next 600,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, and S parking spaces per 1,000 square feet for over 800,000 square feet of gross leasable f1oc~ area.