pm_750305 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Minutes March 5, 1975 The March 5, 1975, regular meeting of Roseville Planning Commission was called to order by Acting Chairman G. Johnson at 7:30 p.m. Members present: G. Johnson, Kellett, Membrez, and V. Johnson. Cushing arrived at 7:35 p.m. and Grauel arrived at 9:35 p.m. Members absent: Durgin Staff present: Midwest Planning Representative Howard Dahlgren, Assistant City Engineer Terry Kramer, and Assistant City Manager Steve North. Approval of Minutes Mr. V. Johnson moved and Mr. Membrez seconded that the minutes of the regular meeting of February 5, 1975, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes: V. Johnson, Membrez, and G. Johnson. Nays: None. Abstain: Kellett. Planning File 877 - Art Gluek request for division of lots at 1909 and 1910 Gluek Lane. Presentation Mr. William Mueller representing Mr. Gluek indicated that they desire to divide the lots so that they c8UJd be sold. He stated that people today cannot afford to buy large lots and build a house at the same time. Mr. Mueller indicated that an ~isting lot on Gluek Lane is .77 of an acre. He stated that the four new lots creaed by the divisions would all be .87 acre or more. Mr. Mueller commented that there are no deed restrictions on the two lots proposed to be divided. Discussion Mr. Membrez stated that some of the residents on Gluek Lane have written letters stating that they were told at the time they bought ther lots that none of the lots in the subdivision could be divided. Mr. Mueller stated that he made no such state- ments at the time of selling the other lots and made no promises that the remaining lots would not be divided. Mr, G. Johnson inquired if there were any time limitations on the restrictions in the deeds on the lots that have already been sold. Mr. Mueller indicated that he didn't know what was in each individual deed. Mr. V. Johnson asked what the specific restrictions were on the lots that have already been sold. Mr. Mueller indicated that he could not remember the specific restrictions. Mr. Donald Bucher, 1981 Gluek Lan~ indicated that the restrictions that were placed on his deed expIred in 1965. Mr. Frank Hasselman, 1900 Gluek Lane, stated that when he bought his lot it was made very clear to him, by Mr. Mueller, that no lots of the subdivision would ever be divided. Mr. Robert Baker, 1926 Gluek Lane, stated that when he bought his lot in 1958, that he had looked at all the vacant lots on Gluek Lane and that he had been told by Mr. Mueller that none of the vacant lots could be divided. Mr. V. Johnson suggested that perhaps the reason for concern on the part of the citi- zens was that if these two divisions were approved, other lots on Gluek Lane with