pm_761006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~3 Discussion Mr, V Johnson asked if Outlot A was still part of the proposed plato Mr, JIm Johnson) replied that it waso Mr V.c Johnson comnented that if Outlot A were to go tax forfeit the government would then have to maintain ito He asked if the applicant would have any objection to Outlot A becoming part of Lot 3.0 ML Jim Johnson responded that they would prefer not to do it from the standpoint of salability of the propertyo However, they would not oppose including Outlot A as part of Lot 3 Mrc. Fred Squires, representative of the trustees of Alliance Church, inquired if any fIlling of the pond would occur, Mr Jim Johnson responded: "No" 0 My 0 Squires asked if there was room to build a home on Lot 3 and Mr 0 Dahlgren responsed there was. Several residents in the area indicated they were sure there was not enough room to con- struct a home on Lot 3 and some even questioned whether there could be two homes built on the amotmt of dry land availableo Mro Dahlgren indicated that the survey presented by the applicant showed approximately 10,500 square feet of dry land on Lot 30 He stated that a house could be built on Lot 3 containing over 2400 square feet on one floor and still conform to all the setback requirementso The residents in the area questioned the validity of the survey, Mra Don Harvey, 1865 Cleveland, indicated he would like to see the City buy it for park land, Mrs 0 Cushing felt that perhaps two lots should be permi ttedo Mr, Jim Johnson stated Mrs., Healy would be willing to have only the two lots 0 Mro Harvey felt that because of all the water area on the property that there would be room for only one good homeo Mr. Jim Lockerall, resident in the neighborhood, expressed concern about making a decision without mowing for sure whether the survey was correct 0 Mrso Healy COnnTIented that she tm.derstood Mr, Harvey enjoyed the open space provided by her property 0 However, she needed to sell the property 0 Mr 0 Pat McIver, Draper Avenue, inquired if the property could be staked out showing the location of the proposed lots, RecoImnendation Mro Rukavina moved and Mra Mastel seconded, that the Comnission reconnnend approval of Dorothy Healy's request for preliminary plat "Healy Pondview" at 1955 Cleveland, with the condition that the plat include two lots 0 However, the Commission would also reo cOnnTIend approval of three lots if Mrso Healy can show by staking the property that three lots are possibleo This staking should occur prior to the Council meeting of October 18, to provide an opporttmity for the Council and residents to view the property with the stakes in placeo Roll Call, Ayes ~ Go Johnson, Rukavina, Mastel, Simons, Cushing and Va Johnson, Nays: None 0