Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-6- <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren stated that a Pla.'1ned Unit DevelopITent (POD) '.tlould, in his opinion, be a <br />good idea since it would all&' additional flexibility regarding the location of hOI1ES <br />and would provide the neigbbors clearer picture of the effects of the proposed develop- <br />rrent. Mr. Dahlgren suggested that the Commission possi.bl.y consider continuing the item in <br />order to resolve SCIre of t.l-}e problems ",,-nIch have developed <br /> <br />Recomrendation <br /> <br />Mr 0 Rukavina rrDved, Mr 0 Mastel seconded, t:2,e Ccxrrnissian ccntinue 'Thomas Cormelly IS <br />request for preliminary plat at 1870 Alta Vista D~ive_ Ron Ca.ll, Ayes~ CUshing, <br />Rukavina, Dressler, SiIrons, MastelfJor..nS'on. Nays: None 0 <br /> <br />Planning File 1136 - Robert Daly requEst i:c..r 8.!?€"ci.al us,e permit and variance to parking <br />and punp island setback at 1526 West County Road B <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />MrQ Dahlgren indicated that tIJe applicant requesUng a sI?€cial use pe.rndt and var- <br />iance to setback in orde.r to rem:rlel the eXIsting Q Petroleum gas stat10n located at the <br />northerly entrance to the Har Mar Shopping Center 0 The pro,tX!sal includes an addition to <br />parking on the east side, enlarged purrp sLations to the north and additional landscaping <br />on the periIreter of the sitew 'The variarl(;e rEoXjuired since no side yard setback is pro- <br />posed on the easterly perirnet61: of the 5~.te.. In zd.ditioni1 the applicant is proposing to <br />locate a purrp island 14~ feet from the propeL ty .L:me as opposed to 25 feet as :required 0 <br />Mr. Dahlgren noted that the purrp island to the north is presently a non-conforming usew <br /> <br />Mr. Kevin Ganyaw of Q Pet.J:'Oleum Corporation; stau::rl that they do not plan to increase the <br />size of the present building nor tochange the exterio.r, They do intend to rem:Jdel inter- <br />ior portions of the building and to improve the site by adding additional landscaping, <br />parking and by rerccving the purrpto the west of the building Q <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Mastel stated he had noted a large tank S.ltting on the 81 te at the present tine and <br />asked what the tank 8 S intended use was 0 <br /> <br />Mr. Ganyaw stated that they were initially under the undeJ:standi.rgthat work could proceed <br />without a special use permit and as a result had ordered tIle equiprrent prior to the <br />approval. <br /> <br />Mr 0 Rukavina asked if the waste container would remain in the sarre location and also if <br />the applicant intended to change or expand the exist:mg signs 0 <br /> <br />Mr. Ganyaw stated that he doegotntend to re locate the waste center nor to add additional <br />signs on the exterior of the building 0 <br /> <br />Mr. Dick M:Ginley, General Manager afHar .tm Shopping Center, stated that his firm was <br />first aware of the proposed rerrodel11ng when it received. a public notice and that they <br />were quite concerned about the increased congestion and traffic that may occur at the <br />entrance. In addition, he st.ated that Har Mar was interested in purchasing the property <br />in order to inprove their parking lot but, had as of yet been unable to reach an acceptable <br />agreerrent with the dealers 0 Conseque.'1tl y, Ea.I r/far is requesting additional tine in order <br />to attenpt to work out the purchase of th.e gas station 0 <br /> <br />Mr. Ganyaw questioned whether the pro[JOsed re1ThJdelling would increase traffic oongestion <br />on this site, since no expansion was anti.cipatecL In his opinion, the proposed remJdelling <br />was the best solution to the problem gi'vin9 size of the site, Mr. Ganyaw also stated that <br />