pm_790801 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-5- Mr. Dahlgren inquired if the ponding area on the northeast comer of the property intruded within 50 feet of the shoreline. Mr. Van Wormer indicated there would probably be SOlIe changes in the grading because the final oontours had not yet been developed. Mr. Henry Blonberg indicated that he would like to see IIDre flexibility regarding the use of the shoreline. He stated that he has been going to the site for rrost of his life and felt many of the trees are no IIDre than weeds. He suggested it might be better to landsca~ the shoreline so that people could use it and enjoy it. Fecormendation Mr. Rukavina roved and Mrs. Cushing seconded, that the Comnission recorrrrend approval of Zi.Itm=rman Fealty and Watersedge Building Partnership request for special use pennit, variance to the 300 foot parking distance requirem=nt, variance to shoreline setback and approval of shoreline development permit at 1500 County Road B-2 with the fo11<M- ing conditions: 1. '!hat no building or disruption of lakesho:re shall occur wi thin 50 feet of the lake and if the applicant proposes to disrupt the shoreline within the 50 feet, a revised plan shall be submitted at the August 13, Council hearing. 2. '!hat the applicant provide a detailed plan of the materials and color of the exterior of the building at the August 13, City Council rceeting hearing. 3. That a traffic control study be made and if controls are required, that the applicant pay their fair share of the cost. Roll Call, Ayes: CUshing, Dressler, Rukavina and Mastel. Nays: SiIIDns. Mr. Sirrons indicated that he voted against the proposal because he didn't feel the Corrmission had enough infonnation to determine if all of the sho~line should be preserved or not. He felt there could potentially be value in having SOIre of the shoreline made rrore usable for the people who will be working in the building. Mr. Rukavina indicated he agreed with Mr. Sirrons to a certain extent, h<Mever, he felt with the infomation the Corrmission had, that the 50 foot restriction should be placed on the approval and if the applicant desires to do work wi thin that 50 feet SOlIe time in the future, trey could apply for an anended special use permit. Mr. Mastel indicated that there was a nesting area along the west shoreline of Zintrerman Lake and that he would like to see the total shoreline preserved. He stated that if the applicant decides to make changes in the future, he could request an anended special use permi. t. Conprehensive Deve10prcalt Plan Mr. Dahlgren presented the Conmission a IIemJ dated August 1, 1979, which contains several arrendIrents to the proposed Conprehensi ve Deve10prrent Plan, Part II. '!he Corrmission accepted these arrendrrents and they will be incorporated in the proposed Conprehensive Development Plan. Mr. Rukavina M:>ved and Mrs. CUshing Seconded, that the Comnission conduct a public hearing at the Septercber 5, 1979 rceeting to consider and approve the Rosevi11e Com- prehensive Development Plan. Roll Call, Ayes: SiIrons, Cushing, Dressler, Rukavina and Mastel. Nays: None.