My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_800102
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1980
>
pm_800102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:18 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:36:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/2/1980
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Roseville and suCh persons are speL.Lfically given right <br />to enforce these restrictions through any proceedings at law or <br />equity against any person or persons violating or threatening to <br />violate such restriction and to recover any daIPages suffered by <br />them from any violation thereof. <br /> <br />'Ihe Conmission was provided a letter from Mr. Bob Bell, Roseville City <br />Attorney, which revif!Ned the proposed restrictive convenant. Mr. Dahlgren <br />indicated that the applicants have agreed to dedicate 16~ feet of additional <br />right-of-way to Ramsey County for Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. John Daubney, attorney for the applicants, indicated that they propose <br />to naintain the exterior of the house as it exists and they will be rem:Xlelling <br />the interior of the house for law office use. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. V. Johnson asked that if the rezoning request were approved, when the <br />restrictive convenant would be filed. <br /> <br />Mr. Daubney responded that it would be filed as soon as it were approved. <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina inquired what rights the property owner of the lot would have <br />to revoke the convenant. <br /> <br />Mr. Daubney indicated that the convenant could not be revoked without the <br />consent of the property owner, the neighbors and the City of Roseville. <br /> <br />Mrs. Dressler asked if sarrething went wrong and the convenant was not adhered <br />to, would the neighbors have to hire an attorney to get it corrected. <br /> <br />HI:'. Daubney indicated they could hire an attorney or they could go to <br />ConcilIation Court. <br /> <br />Mr. Tieso and Mr. Stevens indicated that they would grant an easement to <br />Rarrsey County for the 16.5 feet of additional right-of-way needed by Rarcsey <br />County for Lexington Avenue. 'Ihis dedication would be conpleted before the <br />publication of the rezoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Mrs. Dressler indicated she was opposed to the rezoning request because the <br />applicants should be able to rent space in a professional office building <br />instead of coming to the City for a rezoning. <br /> <br />RecoIT1ffi2ndation <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina roved am Mr. G. Johnson seconded, that the Comnission reco~nd <br />approval of Tieso & Stevens request for rezoning from R-l to B-1 at 1840 <br />Lexington Avenue vIi th the understanding that the applicants have agreed to <br />the following: . <br /> <br />1. 'Ihat the Declaration of Restrictive Convenants Docurrent prepared <br />by the applicant be approved. <br /> <br />2. That the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants include the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.