pm_800903 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3- Mr. Don Bergthold, representing White Trucks, indicated that the proposed sign will replace a plyon sign advertising IX:>dge Trucks which had been rem::>ved. Recarmendation Mr. Mastel roved and Mrs. CUshing seconded, that the corrmission reccmrend approval of White Trucks request for variance to sign height, size and setback at 2845 IDng Lake Road. Roll Call, Ayes: Dressler, G. Johnson, Mastel, Rukavina, CUshing and V. Johnson. Nays: None. Planning File 1270 - Peter Connors request for variance to construct a garage in front of the house at 3077 Fairview Avenue. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the applicant proposes to construct a 24 x 26 foot garage on the property. The existing hare is located on the extreme rear portion of the lot. 'Ihe garage is propsed to be constructed in front of the hare and would be setback approximately 14 feet fran the front of the neighbor's heme. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that because the proposed garge would be setback further than the line of the adjacent hanes, and because of the location of Mr. Connor's bane at the rear of the lot, it would appear to be a reasonable variance. Mr. Connor's indicated that because of the location of his house he felt the proposed variance was very sensible. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that no side yard setback variance is required because the house is located in a 5 foot setback area. Mr. Rukavina cornrrented that he felt the application made sense because it would be worse for the neighJ:x:>rs if the garage were constructed as required by the code. Recarmendation Mr. Rukavina roved and Mr. Mastel seconded, that the Carmission reccmrend approval of Peter Connor's request for variance to construct a garage in front of the house at 3077 Fairview Avenue. Roll Call, Ayes: Dressler, G. Johnson, Mastel, Rukavina, Cushing and V. Johnson. Nays: None. Planning File l27l - William Olson rB:,IUest for variance to side yard setback and to keep an existing garage in front of the house at 2478 Hamline Avenue. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the applicant has constructerl. a home on the lot which was divided off fran the Horvath property in 1979. At that t:i..Ire the Planning Camnission attached a conditioo. to lot division approval that the existing garage in front of the house be rem::>ved fran the lot prior to the construction of the new hare. The CoUttil did not attach that condition, hCMever, it is our understanding that it was the council's intent that the garage be rem::>ved. It was not added as a condition because the code would require the garage to be rerroved because it is located in front of the house.