pm_800903 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-6- Mrs. CUshing suggested that Section 8l.010, regarding the banning of newspaper tubes be rewritten to that it is a separate section. Mr. V. Johnson indicated that, although he didn't like the tubes along the city streets, he was concerned about how the paper ~uld be delivered if there were no tubes. He indicated that with the change of delivery fran the young people to adults, it ~uld probably mean increased costs if the tubes were not permitted. After discussion regarding the newspaper tubes, it was decided that a separate section should be prepared prohibiting the tubes or other devices for purposes of delivery advertising and that it should proh; bi t them not only on public right-of-way but also on private property. .Mr. Rukavina indicated he favored the prohibition of robile signs in Section 14.040. Mr. Rukavina IIDved and Mrs. Dressler seconded, that Section 14.040 be amended to prohibit all mobile signs. Roll Call, Ayes: Dress:ler Rukavina, CUshing and V. Johnson. Nays: G. Johnson and Mastel. Recomnendation Mr. Mastel IIDved and Mr. Rukavina seconded, that the Carmission recarmend approval of the proposed miscellaneous ordinance arnendrrents as contained in the IremJ dated September 3, 1980, with the following changes: 1. That mobile signs be prohibited in Section 14.040 2. That newspaper tubes or other devices for the purpose of delivering . advertising.e prohibited on public right-of-way and private property and that a separate code section be prepared. Roll Call, Ayes: Dressler G. Johnson, Mastel, Rukavina, CUshing and V. Johnson. Nays. None. Adjournment Mr. Rukavina noved and Mrs. Dres~ler seconded, that the rreeting be adjourned at 10:00 PM. Roll Call, Ayes: Dressler, G. Johnson, Mastel, Rukavina, CUshing and V. Johnson. Nays: None.