pm_810805 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3- Mr. Johnson indicated he felt time would be the answer to the problems discussed thus far. He further indicated that he doesn't like to see this matter delayed any more than necessary, but feels that because of the critical nature of this area it would be wise not to make a hasty decision. He asked Mr. Cave if he would be willing to work further with the staff on developing a reasonable single family plat proposal. Mr. Cave indicated agreement. Recommendation Mr. Matson moved and Mrs. Dressler seconded, that the Sam Cave request for preliminary plat, rezoning from R-l to R-6 and special use permit at 2496 Fairview Avenue be continued until the September 2, Planning Commission meeting. Roll Call, Ayes: Matson, Moeller, Rukavina, Dressler, Mastel, Johnson. Nays: None. Planning File 1327 - Glenn Kloskin request for rezoning from R-l to R-2 at 2647 Western Avenue Presentation Mr. Dahlgren explained that the property in question is contiguous to the town- house development north of County Road C and is located at the intersection of County Road C and Western with a frontage of 100 feet on Western and a depth of 135 feet on County Road C. He indicated the applicant proposes to construct a duplex on the property and is, therefore, requesting the rezoning from R-l to R-2. He stated the size of the site is in comformance with minimum requirements for a corner lot. He further indicated the applicant had submitted a site plan proposing access onto Fairview Avenue with the house facing Fairview. He indicated that the applicant had not, as of yet, proposed a design for the unit itself, and indicated the Commission may wish to question the applicant regarding this matter. Discussion Mr. Kloskin, the applicant, indicated that since filing his request, he had found a design that was more to his liking. He presented to the Planning Commission copies of the original site plan and the new site plan which shows the entrance to the duplex from County Road C, which would be to the rear of the proposed duplex. Mr. Rukavina indicated that generally he liked the idea of having the entrance to the duplex in the rear, but that he plan showed optional parking to the front of the duplex, which he was not in favor of. Mrs. Cushing asked if it was possible for the Planning Commission or Council to control the design of the building. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that conditions could not be applied to a rezoning, however, it was of some importance that the Commission understand the type of dwelling to be constructe d in this area. Mr. Kloskin presented the Commission with photos of town homes that he had been considering. Mr. Johnson indicated that he felt this proposal for R-2 in this area was worth- wh il e .