pm_820407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes Wednesday, April 7, 1982 The April 7, 1982 regular meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Johnson at 7:30 p.m. Members present: Rukavina, Dressler, Matson, ~1astel, Moeller, Cushing, and Johnson. Members absent: None. Staff present: Council liaison Al Kehr, Howard Dahlgren, David Drown, and Steve North. Approval of Minutes Mr. Rukavina moved and Mr. Matson seconded that the minutes of the regular meeting of March 3, 1982, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes: Rukavina, Dressler, Matson, Mastel, Moeller, Cushing, and Johnson. Nays: None. Planning File 1362 - Hoffman Electric Company request for special use permit and variances to side yard setback and sidewalk require- ment at 2350 Fulham and request for variance to the number of parking spaces required at 2251 through 2295 TH 36, and 2350 Fulham. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren indicated the Planning Commission and Council had previously approved a special use permit, under the new B-4 zoning district, for con- struction of Hoffman Electric Company's headquarters. Since that approval, Hoffman has acquired the residential lot located on the northwestern portion of property, and is applying for the same special use permit and variances for that parcel. The applicant originally proposed a two-story building, but is considering three stories, if it is economically feasible. The two-story plan includes 168 parking spaces, whereas 162 spaces are required by ordinance. The three-story plan provides 280 spaces, whereas 309 spaces are required. The applicant is applying for the parking variance for the three-story facility, if it proves feasible. Mr. Dahlgren indicated the applicant has provided a summary of the employee parking requirements, and it appears the 280 spaces provided for the three- story building would meet their needs. Mr. Dahlgren commented there is sufficient area on the property to provide the 309 spaces required. He suggested the Commission could attach a condition to the variance that if the parking were determined to be inadequate, the additional required parking would be provided. Mr. North indicated the Commission may want to consider the three conditions that were attached to the approval of the original special use permit and variance request.