Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br />MAY 4, 1983 <br />-6- <br /> <br />proposed to be built on this property. The variances were approved, but the <br />structure was not built. Roberts Construction is now proposing a very <br />similar building on the same property, and is requesting variances which <br />are less than those previously approved. Since the past variances have <br />expired, Roberts Construction must reapply for the variances. The proposed <br />front yard setback is 36 feet; the required setback is 40 feet. The <br />proposed floor area ratio is .39; the required ratio is .30. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina expressed concern about the exterior appearance of the proposed <br />structure. Roberts Construction had proposed to use brick on two sides of <br />the building and painted block on 2 sides. Mr. Rukavina and Mr. Dahlgren <br />were concerned that the proposed exterior treatment would give the building a <br />"front" and a "back", which the City is trying to prevent. Roberts Construction <br />indicated they were willing to work with City staff to develop an attractive <br />exterior treatment. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Matson Moved and Moeller Seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval <br />of Roberts Construction's request for variances at 1948 County Road C, with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />1) That Roberts Construction work out the details of the building's exterior <br />wi th Ci ty staff. <br /> <br />2) That the development be constructed in accordance with plans dated March 2, <br />1983. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Wiski, Dressler, Johnson, Matson, Moeller, and Rukavina. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />Dressler Moved and Johnson Seconded that the meeting be adjourned at 9:45 p.m. <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Wiski, Dressler, Johnson, Matson, Moeller, and Rukavina. <br />Nays: None. <br />