My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_830803
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1983
>
pm_830803
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:28 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:36:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/3/1983
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Meeting <br />Wednesday, August 3, 1983 <br />-3- <br /> <br />Roseville Fire Chief Jim Dougherty expressed concern that the private roadway <br />be included on City maps for public safety purposes. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Matson Moved and Moeller Seconded that the Planning Commission recommend <br />approval of Art Mueller's request for preliminary plat and special use <br />permit for PUD at 1995 County Road B, with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1) That the Ferris Lane intersection be revised to form a "T" intersection. <br /> <br />2) That the drainage and utilities plans be subject to approval by the City <br />Engineering Department. <br /> <br />3) That the tennis court be constructed in accordance with City Code requirements. <br /> <br />4) That the developer bear the cost of the construction of Ferris Lane and the <br />stub street. <br /> <br />5) That the project be developed in accordance with plans dated 7/11/83. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Matson, Moeller, Wiski, Berry, Dressler, and Rukavina. Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1436 - Housing al ternati ves in the R-l zoning district. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren suggested that since the meeting had run fairly long, the Commission <br />should continue the discussion of housing alternatives to the next meeting. <br /> <br />Matson asked whether the requirement of separate utilities for duplexes would <br />also pertain to accessory apartments. Mr. Dahlgren explained that there is no <br />need for separate utilities for an accessory apartment because, unlike a duplex <br />which can be divided among two owners, the property owner cannot sell the <br />accessory apartment. There would always be only one property owner responsible <br />for the utilities of the building. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Wiski Moved and Dressler Seconded that the Planning Commission continue the <br />discussion of the housing alternatives issue until the next Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Matson, Moeller, Wiski, Berry, Dressler, and Rukavina. <br />Nays: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.