pm_830907 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 7, 1983 -5- Johnson indicated she has confidence in the ability of City staff to work out a solution to the use of the land. She suggested the Commission delay action until a compromise is worked out between the City and Presbyterian Homes. Dressler not just land, it indicated the land, the neighborhood. is gone. as part of the park system, is for everyone, She cautioned that once the City gives up the wiski suggested that the needs of the neighborhood, the City, and Presbyterian Homes must be balanced in a final solution. He indicated the present northerly access could cause serious disruption to the neighborhood from traffic. Plans for development of the Langton Lake park area should include access from the west. wiski also suggested the area to be rezoned to R-3 should be shrunken to the minimum required to support Presbyterian Homes' use. Moeller indicated it appeared the source of concern from the neighbors was the active versus passive use of the park area. He indicated a solution to the conflict could be worked out through neighborhood input to the Parks and Recreation Board. Rukavina suggested that presbyterian Homes should demonstrate their ability to receive a certificate of need to proceed with the project before the rezoning so the City does not rezone the property, then find that the project cannot proceed. The City will be left with a large piece of R-3 land, which would probably end up with multi-family use. RECOMMENDATION Matson Moved and Dressler Seconded that the Planning Commission continue the hearing on Presbyterian Homes' proposal to the October 5, 1983 meeting of the Planning Commission, to allow a compromise solution to be worked out between the City, the neighbors, and Presbyterian Homes. Roll Call, Ayes: Moeller, Matson, Wiski, Berry, Dressler, Johnson, and Rukavina. Nays: None. PLANNING FILE 1436 - Housing alternatives in the R-l zoning district. PRESENTATION Mr. Dahlgren indicated that, since the last Commission meeting, staff has attempted to get a better look at the specific housing conditions in Roseville as related to distribution of housing types and demand for accessory units. The research thus far indicates there may not be a significant level of demand for accessory apartments in Roseville. It is suggested, however, there are a number of instances where a number of persons are living in single-family homes with different surnames and, in some cases, separate phones. Roseville's zoning code allows four unrelated persons to occupy a single-family home. Mr. Dahlgren suggested that at the next meeting, the Commission review the physical accessory apartment development criteria and how it would apply to specific home types in the City. For instance, if two parking spaces are required per unit, the number and type of eligible units would be significantly reduced.