My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_830907
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1983
>
pm_830907
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:30 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:36:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/7/1983
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />September 7, 1983 <br />-4- <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Rukavina inquired as to whether Arden Hills citizens have access to the <br />walkways on the current Presbyterian Homes site. <br /> <br />Reverend Hagstrom responded that the residents have free access to the <br />walkways and may park in the Presbyterian Homes' parking lot to make use <br />of the walkways. <br /> <br />Dressler asked what Presbyterian Homes' objection is to Roseville purchasing <br />the land. <br /> <br />Reverend Hagstrom responded that they want to assure outdoor amenities for <br />their residents, and they want to control the area to assure a safe, <br />compatible environment. <br /> <br />Matson suggested that active and passive uses in the park are compatible with <br />each other and with an elderly housing project. <br /> <br />Matson expressed concern that if Presbyterian Homes controlled the southerly <br />portion of the property, they could place undue restrictions on the public's <br />use of the area. <br /> <br />Matson also indicated it may be premature to act on the request before all <br />alternatives have been discussed and an attempt has been made to work out <br />a compromise concerning the ownership and use of the land. <br /> <br />Rukavina indicated the proper time to negotiate the use of the park area is <br />before taking action on the rezoning. Rukavina inquired as to whether <br />Presbyterian Homes would have an objection to proposing legal restrictions <br />which would retain the southerly area as a park in perpetuity. <br /> <br />Presbyterian Homes' attorney indicated they could enter into a legal restriction <br />which would meet the needs of both parties. <br /> <br />Howard Dahlgren indicated there is no need to move the southern boundary of the <br />R-3 rezoning to the south of the tennis courts to support the elderly care/housing <br />project. <br /> <br />Berry expressed concern regarding the adequacy of parking for employees and <br />visitors. <br /> <br />Reverend Hagstrom indicated their current facility has a lower parking ratio <br />than the proposed facility, and has no parking problems. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.