My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_840711
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1984
>
pm_840711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:34 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/11/1984
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Heeting <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 11, 1984 <br /> <br />The July 11, 1984 regular meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission <br />was called to order by Chairman Donn Wiski at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Members Present: Dressler, DeBenedet, Matson, Moeller, Berry and <br />and Wiski. <br /> <br />Members Absent: None <br /> <br />Staff Present: Council Liaison Al Kehr, Howard Dahlgren, David Drown, <br />and Ron Moorse. <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br /> <br />Matson moved and Dressler seconded that the minutes of the regular <br />meeting of June 6, 1984, be approved. Roll Call, Ayes: Dressler, <br />DeBenedet) ~1atson) Moeller, Berry, and Wiski. Nays: None. Abstain: <br />Johnson, because she was absent from the meeting. <br /> <br />Planning File 1488 - William Jones request for rezoning and special <br />use permit for P.V.D. at 2551 Lexington. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Howard Dahlgren indicated that the Planning Commission and Council seem <br />to be in agreement regarding the merit of the development proposal, but <br />that a question remains concerning how to handle the access to the <br />development. ~1r. Dahlgren explained the current transportation routes <br />serving the trailer park and a potential circulation pattern with a <br />public cul-de-sac serving the Jones Proj ect and serving the future <br />development of the trailer park. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren indicated the cost of a private drive is 75% of the cost <br />of a public street. A public street would cost approximately $25,000. <br /> <br />MT. Hoffmeir, architect for the Jones project, indicated there are <br />several alternatives for a private drive: <br /> <br />A. A private dri ve on public right-of-way which will remain a <br /> private drive. <br />B. A private drive on the Jones property. <br />C. A private drive on the vacated Rose Place right-of-way. <br /> <br />Mr. Jones indicated he doesn't want to build a private drive, then <br />possibly pay, in the future, to re-construct it as a public street. <br /> <br />Hr. Dahlgren indicated an alternative is to construct the public street <br />now and possibly defer the assessment to the trailer park. <br /> <br />Mr. Jones indicated he would prefer the public street be built now. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.