My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_850703
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1985
>
pm_850703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:37 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/3/1985
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Meeting <br />Wednesday, July 3, 1985 <br /> <br />The July 3, 1985 regular meeting of the Roseville Planning Commission was <br />called to order by Chairman, Don Wiski at 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />Members present: Dressler, Matson, Berry, DeBenedet, Wiski <br /> <br />Members absent: Johnson and Miller. <br /> <br />Staff present: Drown, Dahlgren, and Waldron. <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br /> <br />Matson moved, Berry seconded that the minutes of the regular meeting of <br />June 5, 1985 be approved. <br /> <br />.. . <br /> <br />Roll call, Ayes: Dressler, Matson, Berry, Wiski. <br /> <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Abstain: DeBenedet. <br /> <br />Planning File 1598 - Frank and Mary Jo Haggerty. Division of 80' lot for <br />duplex construction and rezoning from Rl to R2. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren pointed out that the Haggertys wanted to divide the 80' lot to <br />allow for construction of a duplex with a zero lot line. Additionally, the <br />applicant was requesting rezoning of the lot from R1 to R2. Mr. Dahlgren <br />pointed out that both lots would meet the minimum area requirements, <br />although the proposed lot would have 80' of frontage as opposed to the 85' <br />normally required. Mr. Dahlgren pointed out to the commission that the <br />City does allow the construction of duplex units scattered throughout the <br />City, where such developments are appropriate. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Matson questioned why the lot could not be made 85'. Mr. Haggerty <br />responded that he wanted to maintain his current lot as it is. Mr. <br />DeBenedet questioned the Haggertys as to whether they would be building the <br />duplex on the property. Ms. Haggerty replied that they would not and they <br />would be selling the lot to an interested investor. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski referenced his concern regarding the difficulties of access on <br />Lexington and asked whether the Haggertys would accept a single access <br />point to the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Matson questioned whether the single access point could be made a <br />condition on the rezoning and division of the lot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.