Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Delbert Goodroad, 1075 Sherron, questioned if the parcel was rezoned to R2, <br />would there be additional R2 zoning in the neighborhood. Mr. Wiski pointed <br />out that the City does allow R2 zoning in certain R1 areas when appropriate <br />for duplex development. <br /> <br />Mr: Goodroad stated his concerns regarding property values if the R2 zoning <br />were to occur and asked whether this particular rezoning would be concerned <br />"spot zoning". Mr. Dahlgren replied, that it was not spot zoning as <br />duplexes are low density and again the City does have a policy allowing <br />duplex development in certain R1 areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodroad reiterated his concern regarding the rezoning and what impact <br />it may have on local property owners in the area. <br /> <br />Roger Denet, 1085 <br />duplex as long as <br />wanted to be sure <br />the area. <br /> <br />West Sherron, commented that he is not opposed to the <br />it doesn't have its access on Sherron. Additionally, he <br />that this doesn't set a precedent for major rezoning in <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />Mr. Drown pointed out that with respect to assessments, $1,927 would have <br />to be collected. Additionally the area must have all facilities present, <br />therefore sewer and water must be constructed on the lot. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Mr. Matson moved, Seconded by Ms. Berry that Haggerty request for division <br />of lot and the rezoning from R1 to R2 be approved with the condition that <br />there be an internal turnaround for both units on this particular parcel. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />DeBenedet pointed out that the 80' as opposed to 85' should not create a <br />problem in that the total area requirements are being met. Matson <br />concurred that the 80' did not appear to be a problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski again stated his concerns regarding potential access problems, <br />but that it didn't appear this particular access would create a problem in <br />this case. <br /> <br />Ms. Dressler questioned whether there would indeed be a market for such a <br />duplex structure, particularly with the internal turnaround and Ms. <br />Haggerty stated that this should not be a problem. A number of individuals <br />have stated an interest in the property. <br /> <br />Ms. Berry stated her concern regarding forcing two driveways on one <br />property that could result in too much pavement. Mr. DeBenedet pointed out <br />that often shared driveways create problems between the respective <br />homeowners. Also, control over architectural standards should be assured. <br />Mr. Wiski pointed out that proper design and planning could make this <br />property worth more and more usable. <br />