Laserfiche WebLink
<br />King is requesting a sign that according to a strict interpretation of the <br />ordinance is a roof sign which is not allowed under the Roseville City <br />Ordinance. Mr. Dahlgren pointed out that the initial concern in <br />establishing this ordinance was to prohibit signs extending from flat <br />roofed commercial/industrial structures. Mr. Dahlgren felt as long as the <br />sign was not silouetted above the building, it wasn't really a significant <br />problem. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked if the ordinance said "no roof signs above the parapet" <br />would the proposed Burger Sign be illegal? Mr. Dahlgren stated in effect <br />it is below the parapet. <br /> <br />Mike Nordstrom from Burger King discussed the proposed sign and showed the <br />Council drawings of how the sign would appear on said building. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked Mr. Dahlgren that if this was indeed a wall sign, would it <br />comply. Mr. Dahlgren replied in the affirmative. <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski stated that he would be voting on the sign variance in this case <br />and not on the traffic issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Matson stated that he was concerned about the traffic situation on <br />Cleveland. He then agreed to meet with Mr. Nordstrom at a future date to <br />discuss these concerns. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Ms. Dressler moved, seconded by Matson that Burger King variance on sign <br />location at southwest corner of County Road C and Cleveland Avenue be <br />approved. <br /> <br />Roll call, Ayes: Dressler, Matson, Berry, DeBenedet, and Wiski. <br /> <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Other Business <br /> <br />Parking Issue <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed his report regarding the parking problems in the <br />Fuddruckers, Cattlemen Company, and MGM area. In this study, Mr. Dahlgren <br />found that the large public waiting spaces contribute to the problem. <br />Additionally, the lounge and single bar concept increase the demands on the <br />parking. The restaurants in the area do provide more parking than the <br />ordinance requests and Mr. Dahlgren anticipates that once the newness of <br />these areas wears off, the parking pressure may ease. Additionally, Mr. <br />Dahlgren stated if parking continues to be a problem, property could be <br />leased from the state that would provide additional parking areas for the <br />respective restaurants. Mr. Dahlgren stated that the ordinance should not <br />be adjusted at this point in time until he has an opportunity to look at <br />different types of restaurants and the different types of parking needs of <br />the respective restaurant types. <br />