Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Wiski asked number one, where is the applicant and why isn't he present <br />to discuss his proposal and secondly, procedurally how can design of the <br />duplexes be controlled in the area? Mr. Dahlgren replied that he was <br />unaware of why the applicant was not present. Mr. Dahlgren pointed out <br />that in Roseville, with respect to both single family and duplexes the <br />Roseville ordinance does not require design approval of either one. <br /> <br />Mr. Wi ski reiterated again that he felt the applicant should be present to <br />discuss the proposal. Mr. DeBenedet stated that he would prefer to table <br />the issue at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Matson asked whether the planning commission could attach conditions to <br />a rezoning request. Mr. Dahlgren stated that the commission could not and <br />that it .can't force design standards in a rezoning matter. <br /> <br />Dressler pointed out that two of the Green duplexes in the area are rented <br />and that may be why some of the difficulties in terms of appearance have <br />occurred. Councilman Kehr confirmed that the respective duplexes in <br />question are indeed rented. '. <br /> <br />Mr. Matson stated that he has no problems with the duplex per se but would <br />like to have the applicant there to discuss the proposal. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked again whether rezoning can be conditioned as he has heard <br />from an attorney on a planning commission elsewhere that this can indeed be <br />done. Mr. Dahlgren stated in his many years of experience including <br />significant court experience, that you can condition a plat, a conditional <br />use, or a development agreement, but not a rezoning. <br /> <br />Dressler stated in her opinion the maintenance of the duplex is the issue, <br />not the duplex per see <br /> <br />Mr. Drown stated that an additional charge of $3218 would be needed on this <br />lot. Additionally, he is concerned that number one, there is no record of <br />an easement, number two a portion of the property is under water, and <br />thirdly, the City should have a drainage easement with respect to that <br />pond. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, seconded by Dressler to table Mr. Paulsen's rezoning <br />request (R1 to R2) until the August meeting. <br /> <br />Roll call, Ayes: Dressler, Matson, Berry, DeBenedet, and Wiski <br /> <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Item 1603 - Burger King Sign Variance <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren pointed out that at the previous meeting of the planning <br />commission Burger King was given an approval for the development of a <br />restaurant at the southwest corner of County Road C and Cleveland. Burger <br />