pm_850807 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 Mr. Roger Hess, 1913 Shadybeach Avenue, stated that all members were opposed to the project, and asked how high in relation to the neighbor's roof. Mr. Jensen replied approximately six feet higher. of his family the roof would be that it would be Mr. H. R. Klingbeil, 892 Wagner Place, discussed the problems with the lots, and wanted to know the total square footage on the proposed lot. Mr. Jensen replied that the plan is drawn to scale, and that the lot is two hundred thirty one feet wide. Mr. Hess asked whether there are double garages. Mr. Jensen replied they are currently single garages. Roger Hess, Jr., of l898 Wagner Place, questioned whether one could safely get a car out of the proposed driveway. Mr. Jensen replied that the driveway was at the seventy-five degree angle, and a driveway to be safe should not really be less than a sixty degree angle. Warren Wilson, 1901 Wagner Place, asked if there would be enough room for visitors with respect to the parking on site. Mr. Jensen replied parking for visitors was indeed adequate. Mr. Klingbeil asked to have this issue tabled for thirty days, and he would like to show the Planning Commission what a "mess" the lot really is. Doris Klingbeil asked whether all the area would be blacktopped. Mr. Jensen stated it would not be blacktopped between the garages. Mr. Hess stated he was against the project because of its density, and it was also his opinion that you could not force Con/Spec to comply with the plan as submitted. Mr. Hess, Jr. also stated he was against the project as a result of the density and the potential drainage problem. Mr. Klingbeil asked how the proposed roof could only be six to eight feet higher than his residence if his home is only one story. Mr. Wiski pointed out that you can build three single family homes today on that parcel, thus something is going to occur there, and it was in the Planning Commission's best interest to encourage the best possible development on that parcel. Mr. Matson asked how the structures would be built on the parcel, and how Con/Spec proposed to work within the contours of the land. Mr. Jensen illustrated to the Planning Commission members how the development would be placed on the property, and how the roof of this property related to the Klingbeil property. Mr. Hackworthy stated that it was his intent to build a very high quality project as depicted on the plan. He stated he had filed a utility bond. Ms. Johnson stated that she did not support the project as it was too many buildings for that particular area. Mr. Miller agreed that this could be a particularly difficult development for the proposed property, but he was certainly more uncomfortable with three single family homes being built on that area.