pm_850807 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Meeting August 7, 1985 Page 5 Mr. DeBenedet pointed out that three duplexes could be built on that site, and he was more comfortable supporting the variances to the floor plan in that it would help create more space for the proposed development. Mr. Matson stated that he liked the project now that it had one driveway, and the development was good for that area, particularly in terms of the fact that it is a transitional area. Mr. Wiski pointed out that Roseville has supported duplexes in the past, and that nonconforming commercial use exists in the south of this area, and if that use was conforming, the duplexes could be built without any resulting concerns. Additionally, only one driveway is now being proposed, or seven vehicle trips per day. This could very well be the best means of using that unique land area. Ms. Johnson stated that she was not convinced that the proposed driveway is the best plan that could be presented for that area. Ms. Dressler stated that she was concerned that the third unit does not have a yard, therefore this may not be a very marketable structure. Ms. Johnson stated that the neighborhood is essentially R-I, therefore the area shouldn't be rezoned for multiple uses. Mayor Demos stated that the City has treated duplexes identical to R-l areas. Recommendation Mr. Matson moved, seconded by Mr. Mueller, to recommend the rezoning from R-l to R-2, and urged the Commission to identify this motion with the proposed PUD. Discussion Mr. Dahlgren stated that the City could hold final approval until the plat is properly filed. Roll Call: Ayes: Matson, Mueller, DeBenedet, and Wiski Nays: Johnson and Dressler Matson then moved, seconded by Miller, to approve the variance and the PUD submitted with the following conditions. l. That the final plat be submitted. 2. That the driveway is twenty feet wide. 3. That a landscaping plan be submitted. 4. That three cross easements are executed for maintenance purposes. 5. That separate utilities for available for each home. 6. That concrete curb and gutters be developed. 7. That building plans are submitted as they were presented to the Commission on August 7.