pm_850807 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Meeting August 7, 1985 Page 7 Planning File 1606 FML Inc. application for zoning from R-1 to R-6, special use permit for planned unit development and division of lot at 2250 Victoria. Discussion Mr. Dahlgren presented the FML proposal which consists of twelve fourplex residential units on 4.9 acres of land. It is necessary that the land be rezoned from R-1 to R-6, which requires 10,000 square feet per unit. Mr. Drown pointed out that this area should be plated. Thus, the proposal should be considered a preliminary plat, and not a lot split. Mr. Drown also stated that he wanted to keep the area for placement of the street sweepings from the City. It was also discussed that there may be a need to loop the water system in the area. Mr. Pope, the architect for FML, proceeded to discuss the project stating there was basically no opposition to the project and they had agreed to extend the fence and make modifications in the property line to accommodate the neighbor's existing fencing. Mr. Pope also stated they would be willing to landscape the site and proceeded to show an artist's concept of the development. Discussion Mr. Wiski asked what the City dumping area in the pit would be used for in the future. Mr. Drown stated it would be used for interim ponding. Mr. Wiski also asked whether the undeveloped pit area once filled in could create further development problems. Mr. Dahlgren replied no, it would not, as no other development can take place because the PUD locks in existing development. Mr. Wiski asked what the parking availability was in the area. Mr. Pope replied that there are 2.5 units per dwelling unit, where two are required right now. Nancy Caspers stated she was concerned about the filling of the pit, as they had hoped it would be filled in immediately. Mr. Drown stated again that we would fill the pit within two years time. Mr. Matson asked Mr. Pope how long they thought it would take to complete the project. Mr. Pope stated that there would be a Spring completion. Resident (unnamed) asked for higher fence, and if the system was looped, who would pay for the actual utility cost. Mr. Drown stated that the City would pay for the easement to achieve the desired loop of the system. Jim Hartman, 775 Sherren Avenue, stated he would like a six foot fence in the area, and asked about the type of plantings.