Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Meeting <br />August 7, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />"Unnamed" resident wants fence extended in the area, but that could create <br />problems. Mr. Matson asked whether the southern part of the pit could be <br />filled in and a fence put up. Mr. Pope stated the southern part could be <br />filled in the Spring, and a fence would be erected. Merlin Wait, 880 West <br />Highway 36, discussed his concern regarding water and ponding in the <br />pit. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Matson moved, seconded by Dressler, to approve the rezoning from R-l to <br />R-6, approval of PUD, and the preliminary plat, with the following <br />conditions. <br /> <br />1. The City has two year access to the pit. <br />2. Concrete curbing be constructed. <br />3. Grading, utilities, and landscape plan be submitted. <br />4. The fence and southernly fill of the pit be completed by July, 1986. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked whether the City should be allowed to keep that pit open <br />for two years, and was also concerned whether parking was adequate. Mr. <br />Matson concurred that parking could be a problem. Mr. DeBenedet stated <br />that he also was concerned about the parking and whether there would be <br />problems for emergency vehicles in the area. Mr. Dahlgren suggested that a <br />new site plan for additional parking be submitted. Mr. Matson and Ms. <br />Dressler concurred that should also be another condition, and that a new <br />parking plan should be submitted. <br /> <br />Roll Call: Ayes: Johnson, Dressler, Matson, Mueller, DeBenedet and Wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />other Business <br /> <br />Parking Study <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed the major elements of the Parking Study which <br />essentially recommends the following changes. <br /> <br />A. 2.8 seats per space, compared to 2.5. <br /> <br />B. For bar and lounges, one parking space per 20 square feet of open <br />space. <br /> <br />c. One space per 50 square feet of banquet area. <br /> <br />D. Outdoor one-half requirement of indoor seating requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked whether there should also be an analysis as to the number <br />of employees of a restaurant, and how they may impact parking needs. Mr. <br />Dahlgren pointed out that new studies have been completed on parking, and <br />