My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_850904
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1985
>
pm_850904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:37 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/4/1985
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Meeting <br />September 4, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Roll Call: Ayes: <br /> <br />Matson, DeBenedet, Dressler, Johnson, Mueller, Wiski <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Plannirut File ~ <br /> <br />Budget Liquor comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, and special use permit <br />at Roselawn and Lexington. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren discussed Graham investments request for construction of a 9,100 <br />square foot liquor store. Mr. Dahlgren discussed the type of zoning that was <br />required and his concern relating to the four driveways, two of which are on <br />Roselawn and two of which are on Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren also pointed out that even though the initial request was <br />discussed in the context of a B-3 rezoning, the B-2 is more workable and <br />essentially more specifically designed for this type of proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Drown discussed the fact that the driveways also concerned him and the <br />drainage water should actually be picked up on the site. Mr. Graham <br />subsequently discussed his proposal and pointed out that he is trying to <br />contact every landowner in the area. He also discussed his application <br />regarding his request for a liquor license. Mr. Graham also stated that he <br />objects to giving up of both driveways since he thought they would be very <br />useful in his operation. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Ms. Dressler asked Mr. Graham why two driveways were needed. Mr. Graham <br />replied that they were important as access in and out of the site for a liqour <br />operation such as he is proposing. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked whether Mr. Graham would be willing to consolidate access with <br />Aces Service Station. Mr. Graham replied no, that he needed a barrier in the <br />area. <br /> <br />Mr. Matson pointed out that for the past year the Planning Commission has <br />tried to cut accesses on the main streets and that the Planning Commission <br />is not simply singling out Graham's business for this particular request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.