My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_850904
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1985
>
pm_850904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:37 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/4/1985
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Meeting <br />September 4, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Mr. Mueller asked what mechanical units would be on the top of the building <br />and whether Mr. Graham would be willing to screen them. Mr. Graham replied <br />that he certainly would. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked why the increased number parking spaces and what about <br />landscaping to the east. Mr. Graham replied that he thought it was stylish to <br />map out increased parking and that he would do anything with respect to <br />landscaping to the east depending upon what the neighbors request. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked what would happen regarding easement on the rear of the <br />property. Mr. Dahlgren replied that the easement should be abandoned, which was <br />previously decided by the Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Frank Whaley pointed out that Mr. Graham did talk to a number of people in <br />the area and did state that he owned the land. Mr. Whaley pointed out that he <br />checked with the Secretary of State and there was no documentation of Graham <br />Liquor being incorporated. He also pointed out that he was not convinced that <br />parking to the north was needed as previously discussed and that there should <br />not be any need to rezone the northern part of the parcel. <br /> <br />Mr. Wiski asked Mr. Graham why they zoned the two parcels together. Mr. <br />Graham replied that that was the terms and conditions of the sale; that both <br />parcels be purchased. <br /> <br />Mr. John Bower of 1048 West Roselawn stated that Graham said that he owned <br />a number of other ,Budget Liquor Stores and that he indeed does not. <br /> <br />Mr. Jay Fisher of 1899 North Oxford asked that if this project were approved, <br />what would it mean in terms of additional types of development that can go in <br />that area. Mr. Dahlgren read from a list of other B-2 type uses and pointed out <br />that the special use permit was just for the liquor operation. <br /> <br />Mr. Fred Eberwine of 1041 Ruggles asked how the documentation of the easement <br />being abandoned would be addressed and what the process is. Mr. Drown stated <br />that the property owners must petition for vacation of such easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Mechel of 1080 Ryan Avenue asked why the Roselawn Avenue section needs to <br />be zoned B-3. Mr. Wiski replied that Graham is only looking for whatever <br />zoning allows the use of a liquor store and Mr. Dahlgren has stated B-2 would <br />be appropriate for such use. <br /> <br />Ms. Joan Fisher of 1899 North Oxford asked if Mr. Graham does indeed have a <br />liquor license and Mr. Graham pointed out that it is still in process. Ms. <br />Fisher also asked, will zoning be modified to original status if the liquor <br />license is not approved. Mr. Wiski replied no. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.